Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
Reload this Page >

Reaction 54 Jet Kit

Community
Search
Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

Reaction 54 Jet Kit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-2017, 09:08 AM
  #3626  
Ken Park
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Ken Park's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, ON, CANADA
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well looks ok with Tamyia Spray paint Luft light Blue, Luft Grey Green and Luft Grey Violet then used Cali-Graphics - FW-190 decals 1/5 scale - Had to cut the Iron-Cross for fuse-sides in 1/2 to get them to fit the Reaction ended up with 4 parts pulled together using masking tape to hold them in place while being applied to the fuse. Worked great!

Used Robart Electric Retracts BVM wheels and air-brakes
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Reaction001.jpg
Views:	251
Size:	913.5 KB
ID:	2208831   Click image for larger version

Name:	Reaction002.jpg
Views:	287
Size:	1.05 MB
ID:	2208832   Click image for larger version

Name:	Reaction003.jpg
Views:	253
Size:	1.21 MB
ID:	2208833  

Last edited by Ken Park; 04-08-2017 at 09:15 AM.
Old 04-08-2017, 10:17 AM
  #3627  
Woketman
My Feedback: (6)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 5,432
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Gorgeous!!!!!
Old 04-08-2017, 12:28 PM
  #3628  
BruceTharpe
My Feedback: (1)
 
BruceTharpe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rogue River, OR
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Wow, outstanding Ken! What turbine?
Old 04-08-2017, 12:31 PM
  #3629  
Dr Honda
My Feedback: (4)
 
Dr Honda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Latrobe, PA
Posts: 2,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

very nice... but I guess it's still cold up there. When's the madden?
Old 04-08-2017, 03:36 PM
  #3630  
Ken Park
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Ken Park's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, ON, CANADA
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi Bruce

When I ordered the kit I asked for the Kingtech K-60G engine mount

What I have on hand are a - Jetmunt 80 currently in a Sprint and a Jet Central Falcon I got in a trade

Will my mount fit either?

Originally Posted by BruceTharpe
Wow, outstanding Ken! What turbine?
Old 04-08-2017, 03:38 PM
  #3631  
Ken Park
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Ken Park's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, ON, CANADA
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not sure! But would like to fly it at the biggest Canadian jet event " Wingham Jets " around 22,23,24 of July


Originally Posted by Dr Honda
very nice... but I guess it's still cold up there. When's the madden?
Old 04-08-2017, 04:26 PM
  #3632  
BruceTharpe
My Feedback: (1)
 
BruceTharpe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rogue River, OR
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ken Park
Hi Bruce

When I ordered the kit I asked for the Kingtech K-60G engine mount

What I have on hand are a - Jetmunt 80 currently in a Sprint and a Jet Central Falcon I got in a trade

Will my mount fit either?
Can't say for certain, but probably not. I think they both are a bit wider than the K-60G. If you need a new mount, I'll take care of you...
Old 04-08-2017, 07:26 PM
  #3633  
redtail
My Feedback: (15)
 
redtail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 2,625
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

​Ken - Wonderful scheme. Really like the satin/flat paint look. Will maiden mine by the end of the month. Chic
Old 04-09-2017, 03:31 AM
  #3634  
Dr Honda
My Feedback: (4)
 
Dr Honda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Latrobe, PA
Posts: 2,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ken Park
Hi Bruce

When I ordered the kit I asked for the Kingtech K-60G engine mount

What I have on hand are a - Jetmunt 80 currently in a Sprint and a Jet Central Falcon I got in a trade

Will my mount fit either?

I have a JC Falcon... and it's a big engine. I'm not sure you will have room between the wing and fuse to even squeeze that one in. I think the 80 may fit with a little work. But as Bruce said... the 60 sized mount won't fit either.
Old 04-09-2017, 02:56 PM
  #3635  
joeflyer
My Feedback: (48)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Plymouth, MI
Posts: 2,965
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Go with the VT80, plenty of power. The Falcon is too big and heavy, and would require lots of nose weight to balance.
Old 04-10-2017, 05:23 AM
  #3636  
Square Nozzle
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Vernon, CT
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Ken, in general you did a nice job finishing the plane however you may run into a lot of resistance with that emblem on the vertical stab.
Old 04-12-2017, 12:31 PM
  #3637  
Ken Park
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Ken Park's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, ON, CANADA
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi Bruce

Yes I'll need a new mount to fit the Jet Munt 80 - I'll stick the old mount into the mail back to you ASAP I got your address off your
web site.

Originally Posted by BruceTharpe
Can't say for certain, but probably not. I think they both are a bit wider than the K-60G. If you need a new mount, I'll take care of you...
Old 04-12-2017, 02:23 PM
  #3638  
joeflyer
My Feedback: (48)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Plymouth, MI
Posts: 2,965
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Nice job, Ken!
Old 05-03-2017, 01:27 AM
  #3639  
SALMONBUG
My Feedback: (1)
 
SALMONBUG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: kampenhout, BELGIUM
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Hello folks,

If you don't mind, belgium will join the party. Received my R54 kit, ordered a jetcat, ordered servos, ordered uat and I studied the booklet. I think it's time to go on with building......
Old 05-03-2017, 11:13 PM
  #3640  
SALMONBUG
My Feedback: (1)
 
SALMONBUG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: kampenhout, BELGIUM
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I am studying the idea of replacing the flaps by speed brakes on the extrados of both wings. I have a set of multiplex speebrakes laying in the workshop for years (my glider era). A good positioning should be against the main spar et the position of the MAC. To place them I will have reduce the tickness of the top main spar about 1mm, all the length of the speebrake put one servo IN each wing panel ( one at center position could have done the job but I feel it's not a good idea to cut in the place were the two wings are glued together)
I made the stock wing subassemblies, but before gluing the ribs I have to decide if I'll do that modification or not.....
I have to say that I strongly hesitate to modify a design who has proven to be good.

The engine will be a jetcat P60SE with kero start option, didn't feel the need of overpowering that bird

Last edited by SALMONBUG; 05-03-2017 at 11:52 PM.
Old 05-04-2017, 03:41 AM
  #3641  
joeflyer
My Feedback: (48)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Plymouth, MI
Posts: 2,965
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SALMONBUG
I am studying the idea of replacing the flaps by speed brakes on the extrados of both wings. I have a set of multiplex speebrakes laying in the workshop for years (my glider era). A good positioning should be against the main spar et the position of the MAC. To place them I will have reduce the tickness of the top main spar about 1mm, all the length of the speebrake put one servo IN each wing panel ( one at center position could have done the job but I feel it's not a good idea to cut in the place were the two wings are glued together)
I made the stock wing subassemblies, but before gluing the ribs I have to decide if I'll do that modification or not.....
I have to say that I strongly hesitate to modify a design who has proven to be good.

The engine will be a jetcat P60SE with kero start option, didn't feel the need of overpowering that bird
Why? The standard flaps work just fine. Save yourself the trouble. I don't where speed brakes have any advantage.
Old 05-04-2017, 04:05 AM
  #3642  
SALMONBUG
My Feedback: (1)
 
SALMONBUG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: kampenhout, BELGIUM
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Hello joeflyer

My reason to think speed brakes could be fine, is mainly because this plane doesn't need any extra lift.

I know that the gain in lift is compared to the drag increase is interesting in the first degrees of flaps extension and that flaps give a big drag when extended at high angles ( 60 degrees is a huge angle).
This certainly work fine with the flaps.

Be certain I don't denigrate the design of the plane, it's certainly a great performer

My idea of the speed brake was simply to kill the lift because I considered there was no need to increase clmax to slow down.

Sorry for my poor english, I have difficulties to explain my considerations.

Last edited by SALMONBUG; 05-04-2017 at 04:15 AM.
Old 05-04-2017, 04:38 AM
  #3643  
Art ARRO
My Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Holland Patent, NY
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Salmonbug,
You can program crow or "butterfly" to the standard ailerons to kill lift on landings. There's some discussion on the designer's website on using crow for landings-no need to modify the wings, just program the transmitter,
Rgds,
Art ARRO
Old 05-04-2017, 04:40 AM
  #3644  
joeflyer
My Feedback: (48)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Plymouth, MI
Posts: 2,965
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Salmonbug,
Your English is fine. You are correct, with those huge wings the plane has plenty of lift. I use 50-60 degrees of flap, and usually end up gliding it in for landing with the engine at idle. Your idea for speed brakes would help. I was just questioning whether or not it's worth the extra work. Another approach is to use crow (ailerons up when flaps are down) to slow the plane down. I have not tried crow since I am comfortable bring mine in slow for landings.

Joe
Old 05-04-2017, 04:45 AM
  #3645  
afterburner
My Feedback: (18)
 
afterburner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New City, NY
Posts: 3,021
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SALMONBUG
I am studying the idea of replacing the flaps by speed brakes on the extrados of both wings. I have a set of multiplex speebrakes laying in the workshop for years (my glider era). A good positioning should be against the main spar et the position of the MAC. To place them I will have reduce the tickness of the top main spar about 1mm, all the length of the speebrake put one servo IN each wing panel ( one at center position could have done the job but I feel it's not a good idea to cut in the place were the two wings are glued together)
I made the stock wing subassemblies, but before gluing the ribs I have to decide if I'll do that modification or not.....
I have to say that I strongly hesitate to modify a design who has proven to be good.

The engine will be a jetcat P60SE with kero start option, didn't feel the need of overpowering that bird

That's an interesting idea. Not sure you need extra braking with a P-60 but if you go to a bigger engine those brakes may come in handy. I had a P-60 in mine for a few years and then went to a Rabbit and the higher residual thrust at idle has an effect on a plane like this with light wing loading.
Old 05-04-2017, 05:01 AM
  #3646  
SALMONBUG
My Feedback: (1)
 
SALMONBUG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: kampenhout, BELGIUM
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by afterburner
That's an interesting idea. Not sure you need extra braking with a P-60 but if you go to a bigger engine those brakes may come in handy. I had a P-60 in mine for a few years and then went to a Rabbit and the higher residual thrust at idle has an effect on a plane like this with light wing loading.
The goal is to kill the lift not to slow down on ground . I saw that some R54 flyers defect ailerons upward during approach to kill the lift, but they also increase the lift the same time by deploying flaps. ......,)). Flaps are deployed only to increase drag (and I am sure that's fine at high flaps angle)
So my idea was to replace flaps by speebrakes because I think the plane doesn't need the extra lift, it need drag (or less lift) for landing...

Last edited by SALMONBUG; 05-04-2017 at 05:14 AM.
Old 05-04-2017, 09:59 AM
  #3647  
JustFlyIt
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Laurel, MD
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have to admit, speed brakes would look cool though.

But I tend to be a pretty shallow guy that likes cool extras!��

Don
Old 07-07-2017, 06:15 AM
  #3648  
rcguy!
My Feedback: (69)
 
rcguy!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chesterland , OH
Posts: 2,851
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Cool

The flaps are used to create drag, not increase lift. With full flap deflection, you'll need about 1/3 throttle just to maintain slow flight with the wheels out. NO NEED FOR SPEED BRAKES!
Old 07-07-2017, 06:27 AM
  #3649  
JustFlyIt
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Laurel, MD
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

On full scale aircraft flaps are used to lower the minimum speed that an aircraft can fly at (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flap_(aeronautics)). What you stated was a mistake that many of us made at pilot school. This made our detachment commander, LtC Steve Rogers (not Captain America) crazy and he had to pound the notion out of us. Drag is just a by product of that operation...and more power is needed to offset the drag.

When flying the Reaction 54 it is tempting to think about slowing the plane with flaps but we really are adjusting the wing surface for slow flight and landing.

Speed brakes would look cool though, but not really necessary.
Old 07-07-2017, 07:01 AM
  #3650  
rcguy!
My Feedback: (69)
 
rcguy!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chesterland , OH
Posts: 2,851
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

With 60* flap deflection (as recommended by Bruce) only drag is created, no additional lift. The wing has plenty of "lift" even at slow speed, thus the NEED for DRAG to land with the high residual thrust our model turbines have. In fact "CROW" destroys some of it while adding washout to help tip stall.
Over and out....

Dave Rigotti


Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.