Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
Reload this Page >

Boomerang Nano!!!

Community
Search
Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

Boomerang Nano!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-04-2009, 06:49 PM
  #351  
BoomerangGuy
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Christchurch, NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Boomerang Nano!!!

NiceNano little piston.
I am going to buy a Nano and If I buy a wren 44 gold autostart does it come with a onboard starting gas tank?
cheers
George
Old 10-04-2009, 07:50 PM
  #352  
Wayne22
My Feedback: (2)
 
Wayne22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Strathcona county, AB, CANADA
Posts: 5,394
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Boomerang Nano!!!

No problem...we are all here to help. In fact, you helped me, because I assumed the wing bolts went in through the bottom, and would have dug holes in the bottom skin looking for them... but now I see they are on top...carefully hidden, but on top....
Old 10-04-2009, 09:07 PM
  #353  
gruntled
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Anytown
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Boomerang Nano!!!

ORIGINAL: Wayne22

No problem...we are all here to help. In fact, you helped me, because I assumed the wing bolts went in through the bottom, and would have dug holes in the bottom skin looking for them... but now I see they are on top...carefully hidden, but on top....

Anytime I can help out by bungling along . . .


Better luck tonight. I was able to use a 3.5mm cap head screw in the 3mm sleeve that I stripped out last night. The outer-wing panels still take more pressure to get on than I would like, and the elevator doesn't line up perfect . . . but these are niggles I can get worked out over time.

BTW- has anybody else dropped the forward screw into the wing? I have one rattling around in there already and almost dropped another in there tonight.

Steve

.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Db86018.jpg
Views:	46
Size:	116.7 KB
ID:	1288389   Click image for larger version

Name:	Fa85702.jpg
Views:	47
Size:	128.9 KB
ID:	1288390  
Old 10-05-2009, 10:26 AM
  #354  
gruntled
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Anytown
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Boomerang Nano!!!

I am at the point where I need to epoxy the fusleage to the wing center section. In looking at it, it doesn't seem like there is much surface area where the two attach. If I am understanding it correctly, it is just a thin line along the wing saddle of the fuselage that attaches to the upper-skin of the wing - along with the 4 keyed-tabs that insert into the top of the wing. The middle leading edge of the wing center section also looks like it gets glued to the fuselage.

Obviously, the system works just fine because many people have had no trouble with it, but just from looking at it, it makes me wonder a bit how that is enough to hold it all together.
Old 10-05-2009, 10:56 AM
  #355  
w4sm
 
w4sm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Louisa, VA
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Boomerang Nano!!!


ORIGINAL: Socomon

I am at the point where I need to epoxy the fusleage to the wing center section. In looking at it, it doesn't seem like there is much surface area where the two attach. If I am understanding it correctly, it is just a thin line along the wing saddle of the fuselage that attaches to the upper-skin of the wing - along with the 4 keyed-tabs that insert into the top of the wing. The middle leading edge of the wing center section also looks like it gets glued to the fuselage.

Obviously, the system works just fine because many people have had no trouble with it, but just from looking at it, it makes me wonder a bit how that is enough to hold it all together.
I was a little concerned about that as well, but the consensus seems to be that it's fine as it is. I did put some small Aeropoxy filets on the inside of the fuselage where it joins the wing and I added a small block of hard balsa to fill the gap between the front of the wing and the fuselage. The block was glued in with a generous amount of slow cure epoxy. During high-G maneuvers that leading edge area takes most of the load.

Just got my P60se, so completion isn't too far away.

Old 10-05-2009, 10:59 AM
  #356  
geh3
My Feedback: (84)
 
geh3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: wilmington, DE
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Boomerang Nano!!!

I have a WREN SUPER SPORT in mine and it is still working fine ( 18 lbs thrust)
Old 10-05-2009, 09:15 PM
  #357  
gruntled
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Anytown
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Boomerang Nano!!!

ORIGINAL: w4sm

I did put some small Aeropoxy filets on the inside of the fuselage where it joins the wing and I added a small block of hard balsa to fill the gap between the front of the wing and the fuselage. The block was glued in with a generous amount of slow cure epoxy. During high-G maneuvers that leading edge area takes most of the load.
I was looking at it tonight, and I think I may use Gorilla Glue to fill the gap. It is strong and light and will expand to fill the void.

Did y'all have a gap along the wing saddle where it meets the fuselage? Mine isn't a perfect tight fit. I can get it tight in the front or the back, but not both. Shouldn't be a big problem as the Hysol should fill the gap.

Steve
Old 10-06-2009, 03:39 AM
  #358  
BaldEagel
 
BaldEagel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kent, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 9,672
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default RE: Boomerang Nano!!!

Steve

If you can get it tight at the back or front that seems to indicate the wing is rocking on the seating, this will not matter much as the tail is atached to the wing by the booms and it will not change the declarge too much, but you may have a nose up or down flight path if its bad, rig the airframe and look at it from the side to see how the booms look compared to the fus and glue the centre section in on the line you most prefer.

Mike
Old 10-06-2009, 03:10 PM
  #359  
gruntled
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Anytown
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Boomerang Nano!!!

Thanks Mike - I was hoping (perhaps wrongly) that if I lined up the leading edge as shown in the photo below from Chirs Smith's Nano build thread, that the incidence would be correct without need for further measuring.

Steve

.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Pm34802.jpg
Views:	54
Size:	143.1 KB
ID:	1289675  
Old 10-06-2009, 03:29 PM
  #360  
Turbinac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: London, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Boomerang Nano!!!

The incidence of the fuselage is almost immaterial!

The one that matters is the parallel incidence between all the wings and the tailplane. That is automatically set by the way the wings, booms and tail are assembled.
Old 10-06-2009, 03:42 PM
  #361  
BaldEagel
 
BaldEagel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kent, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 9,672
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default RE: Boomerang Nano!!!

That is exactly what I said in my post, its the sit of the fus in the air that will change with the different positions of the wing and tail, as the booms are attached to the wing the declarge will not change.

Mike
Old 10-06-2009, 03:43 PM
  #362  
gruntled
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Anytown
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Boomerang Nano!!!


ORIGINAL: Turbinac

The incidence of the fuselage is almost immaterial!

The one that matters is the parallel incidence between all the wings and the tailplane. That is automatically set by the way the wings, booms and tail are assembled.
Good point! Thanks Alan.
Old 10-07-2009, 11:25 AM
  #363  
w4sm
 
w4sm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Louisa, VA
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Boomerang Nano!!!

Does anyone know if the Jet-Tech 88 oz tank for the Boomerang Intro would fit in the Boomerang Nano?

http://www.angelfire.com/wi/jettech/page2.html

It would be nice to squeeze in a little more than the 50 oz you can get with a Dubro tank.

Thanks.
Old 10-07-2009, 12:21 PM
  #364  
Turbinac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: London, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Boomerang Nano!!!

Nope, it won't fit. I designed the Nano fuselage around the Dubro 50 ounce tank and it's a perfect fit. I get 12 minutes 40 seconds on the Dubro with a Wren MW44, and almost 7 minutes with a P60. No doubt someone will bring out a tank shaped to fit tighter in the hatch top, but for now it's the Dubro.
Old 10-07-2009, 12:25 PM
  #365  
w4sm
 
w4sm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Louisa, VA
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Boomerang Nano!!!


ORIGINAL: Turbinac

Nope, it won't fit. I designed the Nano fuselage around the Dubro 50 ounce tank and it's a perfect fit. I get 12 minutes 40 seconds on the Dubro with a Wren MW44, and almost 7 minutes with a P60.
Thanks, Alan.
Almost 7 minutes on the P60 works for me. I'm usually ready to rest by then anyway!
I'd start with the timer around 5 minutes and sneak up a bit from there depending on the fuel reserves.

Old 10-07-2009, 12:30 PM
  #366  
geh3
My Feedback: (84)
 
geh3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: wilmington, DE
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Boomerang Nano!!!

I get 8 very exciting minutes with my SS powered NANO because I only use part throttle and use full tilt only for spectacular climbs...
Old 10-07-2009, 01:09 PM
  #367  
H.Dale
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jackson, MS
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Boomerang Nano!!!

Andy

Did you get an answer to your pitch up question? I have a Wren 54 on my Nano and am having the same problem. When I go to full throttle it climbs pretty steeply.

Hal
Old 10-07-2009, 01:11 PM
  #368  
geh3
My Feedback: (84)
 
geh3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: wilmington, DE
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Boomerang Nano!!!

Make sure that your flap is fully "up" when flying... mine will do that if the flap is down even a little bit!
Old 10-07-2009, 01:26 PM
  #369  
gruntled
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Anytown
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Boomerang Nano!!!

I had to cut a small rectangle in the balsa/ply cross piece on the back of the fuselage to accomodate the head of the bolt that serves as the control horn for the flap, otherwise the flap wouldn't come up all the way.
Old 10-07-2009, 01:38 PM
  #370  
geh3
My Feedback: (84)
 
geh3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: wilmington, DE
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Boomerang Nano!!!

Yes I had to do the same also I offset my control horn a bit so I get almost 90 degrees! the flap acts as a nice brake this way whan all the way down!
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Nl28434.jpg
Views:	58
Size:	31.3 KB
ID:	1290282   Click image for larger version

Name:	Oj28610.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	61.3 KB
ID:	1290283  
Old 10-08-2009, 07:58 AM
  #371  
gruntled
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Anytown
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Boomerang Nano!!!

Question:

In most installs I have seen, people put the pneumatic gear valves on the upper main equipment tray. Do y'all find you need to get to these often? Why not put them below near the air tanks?

I have also noticed about a 50/50 split on putting the fuel pump on the upper tray or the lower. Does the fuel pump need attention often?

Steve
Old 10-08-2009, 08:08 AM
  #372  
geh3
My Feedback: (84)
 
geh3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: wilmington, DE
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Boomerang Nano!!!

I use electronic air valves ( JetTronic ) these can go anywhere and they take up way less space than the traditional servo+mechanical air valve. The JetTronics ones have the additional advantage of throttling the air to allow slower movement of the retracts ( avoids slamming esp going down!)
I put my pump way up front to avoid adding any weight up front to balance
plus I like to be able to see the fuel tubing to ensure there are no bubbles getting into it!
Old 10-08-2009, 08:25 AM
  #373  
gruntled
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Anytown
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Boomerang Nano!!!

Thanks - I have the airpower electronic valves. So, did you put your air valves on the lower level then?
Old 10-08-2009, 08:27 AM
  #374  
w4sm
 
w4sm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Louisa, VA
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Boomerang Nano!!!


ORIGINAL: geh3

I use electronic air valves ( JetTronic ) these can go anywhere and they take up way less space than the traditional servo+mechanical air valve. The JetTronics ones have the additional advantage of throttling the air to allow slower movement of the retracts ( avoids slamming esp going down!)
I put my pump way up front to avoid adding any weight up front to balance
plus I like to be able to see the fuel tubing to ensure there are no bubbles betting into it!
A note about electronic valves in general.

I've used the AirPower valves on 2 jets and they've worked flawlessly for me. However, be advised that the 2-way AirPower valve (standard retracts) draws 350 mA's continuously, not the 100 mA's advertised. I've confirmed this on multiple valves. The AirPower 1-way valve (brakes or SpringAir-type retracts) draws 350 mA's when active (brakes on or wheels up).

In contrast the Jetronix 2-way valve draws 100 mA's (as advertised) when active and can be set up to draw no current once in locked up or locked down position. I haven't tested their 1-way valve but assume it's the same.

The current draw on an AirPower 1-way valve used intermittently for brakes is a non-issue, but if you're using it for SpringAir-type retracts, or you're using the 2-way AirPower valve, be sure to allow for the current drain when figuring your battery needs.

Old 10-08-2009, 09:11 AM
  #375  
geh3
My Feedback: (84)
 
geh3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: wilmington, DE
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Boomerang Nano!!!

I put them on the top but could have put them on the bottom


Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.