Boomerang Nano!!!
#351
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Christchurch, NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Boomerang Nano!!!
NiceNano little piston.
I am going to buy a Nano and If I buy a wren 44 gold autostart does it come with a onboard starting gas tank?
cheers
George
I am going to buy a Nano and If I buy a wren 44 gold autostart does it come with a onboard starting gas tank?
cheers
George
#352
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Strathcona county,
AB, CANADA
Posts: 5,394
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Boomerang Nano!!!
No problem...we are all here to help. In fact, you helped me, because I assumed the wing bolts went in through the bottom, and would have dug holes in the bottom skin looking for them... but now I see they are on top...carefully hidden, but on top....
#353
Senior Member
RE: Boomerang Nano!!!
ORIGINAL: Wayne22
No problem...we are all here to help. In fact, you helped me, because I assumed the wing bolts went in through the bottom, and would have dug holes in the bottom skin looking for them... but now I see they are on top...carefully hidden, but on top....
No problem...we are all here to help. In fact, you helped me, because I assumed the wing bolts went in through the bottom, and would have dug holes in the bottom skin looking for them... but now I see they are on top...carefully hidden, but on top....
Anytime I can help out by bungling along . . .
Better luck tonight. I was able to use a 3.5mm cap head screw in the 3mm sleeve that I stripped out last night. The outer-wing panels still take more pressure to get on than I would like, and the elevator doesn't line up perfect . . . but these are niggles I can get worked out over time.
BTW- has anybody else dropped the forward screw into the wing? I have one rattling around in there already and almost dropped another in there tonight.
Steve
.
#354
Senior Member
RE: Boomerang Nano!!!
I am at the point where I need to epoxy the fusleage to the wing center section. In looking at it, it doesn't seem like there is much surface area where the two attach. If I am understanding it correctly, it is just a thin line along the wing saddle of the fuselage that attaches to the upper-skin of the wing - along with the 4 keyed-tabs that insert into the top of the wing. The middle leading edge of the wing center section also looks like it gets glued to the fuselage.
Obviously, the system works just fine because many people have had no trouble with it, but just from looking at it, it makes me wonder a bit how that is enough to hold it all together.
Obviously, the system works just fine because many people have had no trouble with it, but just from looking at it, it makes me wonder a bit how that is enough to hold it all together.
#355
RE: Boomerang Nano!!!
ORIGINAL: Socomon
I am at the point where I need to epoxy the fusleage to the wing center section. In looking at it, it doesn't seem like there is much surface area where the two attach. If I am understanding it correctly, it is just a thin line along the wing saddle of the fuselage that attaches to the upper-skin of the wing - along with the 4 keyed-tabs that insert into the top of the wing. The middle leading edge of the wing center section also looks like it gets glued to the fuselage.
Obviously, the system works just fine because many people have had no trouble with it, but just from looking at it, it makes me wonder a bit how that is enough to hold it all together.
I am at the point where I need to epoxy the fusleage to the wing center section. In looking at it, it doesn't seem like there is much surface area where the two attach. If I am understanding it correctly, it is just a thin line along the wing saddle of the fuselage that attaches to the upper-skin of the wing - along with the 4 keyed-tabs that insert into the top of the wing. The middle leading edge of the wing center section also looks like it gets glued to the fuselage.
Obviously, the system works just fine because many people have had no trouble with it, but just from looking at it, it makes me wonder a bit how that is enough to hold it all together.
Just got my P60se, so completion isn't too far away.
#357
Senior Member
RE: Boomerang Nano!!!
ORIGINAL: w4sm
I did put some small Aeropoxy filets on the inside of the fuselage where it joins the wing and I added a small block of hard balsa to fill the gap between the front of the wing and the fuselage. The block was glued in with a generous amount of slow cure epoxy. During high-G maneuvers that leading edge area takes most of the load.
I did put some small Aeropoxy filets on the inside of the fuselage where it joins the wing and I added a small block of hard balsa to fill the gap between the front of the wing and the fuselage. The block was glued in with a generous amount of slow cure epoxy. During high-G maneuvers that leading edge area takes most of the load.
Did y'all have a gap along the wing saddle where it meets the fuselage? Mine isn't a perfect tight fit. I can get it tight in the front or the back, but not both. Shouldn't be a big problem as the Hysol should fill the gap.
Steve
#358
RE: Boomerang Nano!!!
Steve
If you can get it tight at the back or front that seems to indicate the wing is rocking on the seating, this will not matter much as the tail is atached to the wing by the booms and it will not change the declarge too much, but you may have a nose up or down flight path if its bad, rig the airframe and look at it from the side to see how the booms look compared to the fus and glue the centre section in on the line you most prefer.
Mike
If you can get it tight at the back or front that seems to indicate the wing is rocking on the seating, this will not matter much as the tail is atached to the wing by the booms and it will not change the declarge too much, but you may have a nose up or down flight path if its bad, rig the airframe and look at it from the side to see how the booms look compared to the fus and glue the centre section in on the line you most prefer.
Mike
#359
Senior Member
RE: Boomerang Nano!!!
Thanks Mike - I was hoping (perhaps wrongly) that if I lined up the leading edge as shown in the photo below from Chirs Smith's Nano build thread, that the incidence would be correct without need for further measuring.
Steve
.
Steve
.
#360
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: London, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Boomerang Nano!!!
The incidence of the fuselage is almost immaterial!
The one that matters is the parallel incidence between all the wings and the tailplane. That is automatically set by the way the wings, booms and tail are assembled.
The one that matters is the parallel incidence between all the wings and the tailplane. That is automatically set by the way the wings, booms and tail are assembled.
#361
RE: Boomerang Nano!!!
That is exactly what I said in my post, its the sit of the fus in the air that will change with the different positions of the wing and tail, as the booms are attached to the wing the declarge will not change.
Mike
Mike
#362
Senior Member
RE: Boomerang Nano!!!
ORIGINAL: Turbinac
The incidence of the fuselage is almost immaterial!
The one that matters is the parallel incidence between all the wings and the tailplane. That is automatically set by the way the wings, booms and tail are assembled.
The incidence of the fuselage is almost immaterial!
The one that matters is the parallel incidence between all the wings and the tailplane. That is automatically set by the way the wings, booms and tail are assembled.
#363
RE: Boomerang Nano!!!
Does anyone know if the Jet-Tech 88 oz tank for the Boomerang Intro would fit in the Boomerang Nano?
http://www.angelfire.com/wi/jettech/page2.html
It would be nice to squeeze in a little more than the 50 oz you can get with a Dubro tank.
Thanks.
http://www.angelfire.com/wi/jettech/page2.html
It would be nice to squeeze in a little more than the 50 oz you can get with a Dubro tank.
Thanks.
#364
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: London, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Boomerang Nano!!!
Nope, it won't fit. I designed the Nano fuselage around the Dubro 50 ounce tank and it's a perfect fit. I get 12 minutes 40 seconds on the Dubro with a Wren MW44, and almost 7 minutes with a P60. No doubt someone will bring out a tank shaped to fit tighter in the hatch top, but for now it's the Dubro.
#365
RE: Boomerang Nano!!!
ORIGINAL: Turbinac
Nope, it won't fit. I designed the Nano fuselage around the Dubro 50 ounce tank and it's a perfect fit. I get 12 minutes 40 seconds on the Dubro with a Wren MW44, and almost 7 minutes with a P60.
Nope, it won't fit. I designed the Nano fuselage around the Dubro 50 ounce tank and it's a perfect fit. I get 12 minutes 40 seconds on the Dubro with a Wren MW44, and almost 7 minutes with a P60.
Almost 7 minutes on the P60 works for me. I'm usually ready to rest by then anyway!
I'd start with the timer around 5 minutes and sneak up a bit from there depending on the fuel reserves.
#367
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jackson,
MS
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Boomerang Nano!!!
Andy
Did you get an answer to your pitch up question? I have a Wren 54 on my Nano and am having the same problem. When I go to full throttle it climbs pretty steeply.
Hal
Did you get an answer to your pitch up question? I have a Wren 54 on my Nano and am having the same problem. When I go to full throttle it climbs pretty steeply.
Hal
#369
Senior Member
RE: Boomerang Nano!!!
I had to cut a small rectangle in the balsa/ply cross piece on the back of the fuselage to accomodate the head of the bolt that serves as the control horn for the flap, otherwise the flap wouldn't come up all the way.
#371
Senior Member
RE: Boomerang Nano!!!
Question:
In most installs I have seen, people put the pneumatic gear valves on the upper main equipment tray. Do y'all find you need to get to these often? Why not put them below near the air tanks?
I have also noticed about a 50/50 split on putting the fuel pump on the upper tray or the lower. Does the fuel pump need attention often?
Steve
In most installs I have seen, people put the pneumatic gear valves on the upper main equipment tray. Do y'all find you need to get to these often? Why not put them below near the air tanks?
I have also noticed about a 50/50 split on putting the fuel pump on the upper tray or the lower. Does the fuel pump need attention often?
Steve
#372
My Feedback: (84)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: wilmington, DE
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Boomerang Nano!!!
I use electronic air valves ( JetTronic ) these can go anywhere and they take up way less space than the traditional servo+mechanical air valve. The JetTronics ones have the additional advantage of throttling the air to allow slower movement of the retracts ( avoids slamming esp going down!)
I put my pump way up front to avoid adding any weight up front to balance
plus I like to be able to see the fuel tubing to ensure there are no bubbles getting into it!
I put my pump way up front to avoid adding any weight up front to balance
plus I like to be able to see the fuel tubing to ensure there are no bubbles getting into it!
#374
RE: Boomerang Nano!!!
ORIGINAL: geh3
I use electronic air valves ( JetTronic ) these can go anywhere and they take up way less space than the traditional servo+mechanical air valve. The JetTronics ones have the additional advantage of throttling the air to allow slower movement of the retracts ( avoids slamming esp going down!)
I put my pump way up front to avoid adding any weight up front to balance
plus I like to be able to see the fuel tubing to ensure there are no bubbles betting into it!
I use electronic air valves ( JetTronic ) these can go anywhere and they take up way less space than the traditional servo+mechanical air valve. The JetTronics ones have the additional advantage of throttling the air to allow slower movement of the retracts ( avoids slamming esp going down!)
I put my pump way up front to avoid adding any weight up front to balance
plus I like to be able to see the fuel tubing to ensure there are no bubbles betting into it!
I've used the AirPower valves on 2 jets and they've worked flawlessly for me. However, be advised that the 2-way AirPower valve (standard retracts) draws 350 mA's continuously, not the 100 mA's advertised. I've confirmed this on multiple valves. The AirPower 1-way valve (brakes or SpringAir-type retracts) draws 350 mA's when active (brakes on or wheels up).
In contrast the Jetronix 2-way valve draws 100 mA's (as advertised) when active and can be set up to draw no current once in locked up or locked down position. I haven't tested their 1-way valve but assume it's the same.
The current draw on an AirPower 1-way valve used intermittently for brakes is a non-issue, but if you're using it for SpringAir-type retracts, or you're using the 2-way AirPower valve, be sure to allow for the current drain when figuring your battery needs.