Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
Reload this Page >

Skygate/CARF Viperjet

Community
Search
Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

Skygate/CARF Viperjet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-2021, 02:06 PM
  #651  
Dave Wilshere
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,120
Received 738 Likes on 532 Posts
Default

Most of ours the batteries are back of the canopy,..with light JR servos even around the fuel tank.
Old 05-01-2021, 02:51 PM
  #652  
Skunkwrks
Senior Member
 
Skunkwrks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 418
Received 66 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Using those JR 8911 coreless so a beefy servo, using a Jeti Lion 3200 for engine start, two A123 batteries 6.6volts for the CB210.
One Life1800 pack for the GS200 landing gear and a 2100mah 11.1 pack for Navi lights, a total of five batteries.
Dave, how does your Viper fly with CG at the back of the wing tube?
Old 05-01-2021, 02:58 PM
  #653  
Skunkwrks
Senior Member
 
Skunkwrks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 418
Received 66 Likes on 60 Posts
Talking

Originally Posted by Peter A
The Skygate/CARF Viper is very flexible on the CG. I flew mine with no weight in the nose just the batteries located above the nose wheel for 5 years and I sold it and it is still flying today.
You really need NO extra weight at all in the nose. You can pushback to behind the wing tube also, 800gr seems excessive nose weight.
Once I inputted the new position of the rear of the tube, 30mm behind of being at the front

The xicoy then said I only needed 454g of weight as far forward just behind the front bulk head for the gear..

I can move my battery setup back if it's to nose heavy .

I'm using JR 8911 servos so 76gram 2.71oz, with three in the tail makes it harder to get balanced without ballast being added.

Next time I'm doing to use 5000-6000 Liion batteries as ballast first, first build of a jet.


Thanks for your input.

Last edited by Skunkwrks; 05-01-2021 at 03:06 PM.
Old 05-01-2021, 08:39 PM
  #654  
FlyJ
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 112
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Skunkwrks
Once I inputted the new position of the rear of the tube, 30mm behind of being at the front

The xicoy then said I only needed 454g of weight as far forward just behind the front bulk head for the gear..

I can move my battery setup back if it's to nose heavy .

I'm using JR 8911 servos so 76gram 2.71oz, with three in the tail makes it harder to get balanced without ballast being added.

Next time I'm doing to use 5000-6000 Liion batteries as ballast first, first build of a jet.


Thanks for your input.
Only 450g?! Only?!

I would try to balance it the old fashion way. I have my turbine battery up in those nose, and the receiver packs are midway on the canopy and I’d say it’s about perfect. King tech 160, JR 8611s in the tail.
Old 05-01-2021, 10:51 PM
  #655  
Dave Wilshere
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,120
Received 738 Likes on 532 Posts
Default

It’s an aeroplane with a huge stabiliser, so the balance range is also large. The Rebel series are also similar. Using the no wings, balance on the wing fixing screw holes you end up with a perfect flying aeroplane. I have a (well documented) dislike for the electronic scale method.
What ever you have to do to balance as I state in this thread (ideally with no additional weight) do that and enjoy a great aeroplane.
Ensure there is some fuel in the tank or you are going to be adding unnecessary weight and flying nose heavy again.
The following users liked this post:
DenisFerrari (05-02-2021)
Old 05-01-2021, 11:47 PM
  #656  
Blancr
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chipping Norton, , UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 199
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I can confirm that Dave's advice is exactly right. I balanced my Viper as per Dave's instructions and it flew perfectly. More specifically I have an 'electronic balancing machine' but have now reverted to the 'piece of wire / string' method. Much simpler and ultimately, for me, much more precise.
Enjoy the Viper - great flying plane.
Bob
The following users liked this post:
DenisFerrari (05-02-2021)
Old 05-02-2021, 03:29 AM
  #657  
Agrav8ed
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 527
Received 59 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Wilshere
It’s an aeroplane with a huge stabiliser, so the balance range is also large. The Rebel series are also similar. Using the no wings, balance on the wing fixing screw holes you end up with a perfect flying aeroplane. I have a (well documented) dislike for the electronic scale method.
What ever you have to do to balance as I state in this thread (ideally with no additional weight) do that and enjoy a great aeroplane.
Ensure there is some fuel in the tank or you are going to be adding unnecessary weight and flying nose heavy again.
I assume that balancing this way is with the rudder and stabilizers on? (I know, I know but I had to ask). Is the nose gear down or up when you balance this way?
Thanks,
Tone
Old 05-02-2021, 05:14 AM
  #658  
ECalderon
 
ECalderon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Santiago, CHILE
Posts: 234
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Hi
Following Dave's recomendation I have the turbine Life 9.9 V 3800 mah batteries on top of the back of the fuel tank, and two pulse 3600 mah batteries below the windshield. Al JR 8711 servos. It is still a little bit nose heavy (nose tends to drop a bit in knife edge. Initialy I had in the nose the turbine battery, two Duralite 5000 mah Life batteries and about 400 grs or more of lead way up in the nose.

Follow Dave's advice, you won't regret it.

Regards
Eduardo
Old 05-02-2021, 06:51 AM
  #659  
Dave Wilshere
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,120
Received 738 Likes on 532 Posts
Default

Yes, as posted. Tails and canopy glass on. Just no wings.
Old 05-02-2021, 09:06 AM
  #660  
Skunkwrks
Senior Member
 
Skunkwrks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 418
Received 66 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Wilshere
It’s an aeroplane with a huge stabiliser, so the balance range is also large. The Rebel series are also similar. Using the no wings, balance on the wing fixing screw holes you end up with a perfect flying aeroplane. I have a (well documented) dislike for the electronic scale method.
What ever you have to do to balance as I state in this thread (ideally with no additional weight) do that and enjoy a great aeroplane.
Ensure there is some fuel in the tank or you are going to be adding unnecessary weight and flying nose heavy again.
About 1" of fuel/ 1000-800ml in the tank is on for balance. I believe those large tail surface help with a large CG window.

The Xicoy is very accurate for weight but flying it well tell you exactly where the CG should be.
Old 05-02-2021, 09:08 AM
  #661  
Skunkwrks
Senior Member
 
Skunkwrks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 418
Received 66 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blancr
I can confirm that Dave's advice is exactly right. I balanced my Viper as per Dave's instructions and it flew perfectly. More specifically I have an 'electronic balancing machine' but have now reverted to the 'piece of wire / string' method. Much simpler and ultimately, for me, much more precise.
Enjoy the Viper - great flying plane.
Bob
Thanks, Bob I will enjoy this Viper hopefully a long life of many enjoyable flights.

Old 05-02-2021, 09:17 AM
  #662  
Skunkwrks
Senior Member
 
Skunkwrks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 418
Received 66 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Agrav8ed
I assume that balancing this way is with the rudder and stabilizers on? (I know, I know but I had to ask). Is the nose gear down or up when you balance this way?
Thanks,
Tone
A fellow F3A pilot mentioned the same thing about balancing with the noes gear up as it will shift the CG backwards during flight.
That's very fine-tuning of the CG position.
Old 05-02-2021, 09:26 AM
  #663  
Skunkwrks
Senior Member
 
Skunkwrks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 418
Received 66 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ECalderon
Hi
Following Dave's recomendation I have the turbine Life 9.9 V 3800 mah batteries on top of the back of the fuel tank, and two pulse 3600 mah batteries below the windshield. Al JR 8711 servos. It is still a little bit nose heavy (nose tends to drop a bit in knife edge. Initialy I had in the nose the turbine battery, two Duralite 5000 mah Life batteries and about 400 grs or more of lead way up in the nose.

Follow Dave's advice, you won't regret it.

Regards
Eduardo
Sound like your has a similar weight setup as mine.

At 45 incline does the nose drop after a couple of seconds, also do the same manoeuvre invert and take your hands off the sticks to see if it raises or falls down.

Knife-edge has a lot to do with the side surface of the fuselage helping to hold the fuse steady while on it side found this on my Imac planes.


Last edited by Skunkwrks; 05-02-2021 at 09:29 AM.
Old 05-07-2021, 09:42 AM
  #664  
Skunkwrks
Senior Member
 
Skunkwrks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 418
Received 66 Likes on 60 Posts
Default Viper Cayman scheme

What a thread without photos, here some of my Viper with the batteries position for final balance, still have to glue in the front canopy.
Front 3200 Jeti Liion and 2100 Li for Navigation lights

The Jetmunt display is at the front edge of the photo with CB210 box and GS 200 module

Main tank with vent to bottom of fuse and JetsMunt 166.

Wing connection in the plastic loom to protect wires from the intake air.


Old 05-07-2021, 10:03 AM
  #665  
Skunkwrks
Senior Member
 
Skunkwrks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 418
Received 66 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Here a few more photos of the install of my Cayman Viper.


Front left One of three receivers with the vent tube on the side of easy access. Fuel valve and filter downstream before engine consumption.


Front left nose both LiIon packs 3200 mah and 2100 mah. The display for the Jetsmunt engine is on an adjustable base. The receiver switch is located up here.


Nose front right both A123 batteries and Life 2150mah for the GS200 module. A lot neater on this side.


Just behind on the right nose, the bulk of the control wires plus the third receiver, second one for the CB210 unit. You have the pump and ECU control for the Merlin 166 engine.
Old 05-07-2021, 10:32 AM
  #666  
Dave Wilshere
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,120
Received 738 Likes on 532 Posts
Default

You should really use the SMC clear for both the tank supplies, plus keep the overflow tube as short as possible…
Tygon will collapse slightly under maximum draw.
Old 05-08-2021, 08:17 AM
  #667  
Skunkwrks
Senior Member
 
Skunkwrks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 418
Received 66 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Only using a short piece of Tygon from UAT to the pump. The clear tubing didn't want to bend around to reach the pump and applying

that amount of heat to it can make the clear tubing brittle. So Dam if I do and Dam if I don't.

The Other Tygon is for filling the tank, I have found a long overflow tube helps to prevent siphoning of the fuel during the flight.

I experienced with my friends Avainti last year noticing fuel on the outside of the fuse, a couple of feet more of tubing and the problem was resolved.

Old 05-08-2021, 10:01 AM
  #668  
Dave Wilshere
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,120
Received 738 Likes on 532 Posts
Default

I loop the clear tube when it’s close. No heat needed.
Tygon on filler is right.
All you need is the pipe looping up above the height of the tank and it won’t siphon. A long overflow promotes high pump figures…it’s not good.
Your balance battery position allows for canopy/glass etc?
Old 05-08-2021, 10:54 AM
  #669  
Skunkwrks
Senior Member
 
Skunkwrks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 418
Received 66 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

The batteries with the front canopy in I can get my thick fingers in there and pull out the batteries.
High pump number from a long overflow tube, explain why?
Old 05-08-2021, 12:32 PM
  #670  
Dave Wilshere
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,120
Received 738 Likes on 532 Posts
Default

No, I’m asking whether the balance check included all the items. Your set up looks nose heavy.

Because the air that has to go in to replace fuel is dragged along the long tube line.
Old 05-11-2021, 09:58 AM
  #671  
Skunkwrks
Senior Member
 
Skunkwrks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 418
Received 66 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Dave, I'm using the Xicoy balancer with the CG point being at the rear of the tube and not the front.

I'm no concerned with the longish overflow, it's actual 14" short than what I had planned. Those Jetsmunt have a brushless pump so I'm not concerned with the vent line.


Old 05-11-2021, 11:34 AM
  #672  
Dave Wilshere
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,120
Received 738 Likes on 532 Posts
Default

The question was are you checking the balance with everything installed.

Still too long…


Old 05-11-2021, 11:42 AM
  #673  
Skunkwrks
Senior Member
 
Skunkwrks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 418
Received 66 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Oh yes, everything in and on including the canopy front windscreen with five batteries in and like other suggested the rudder is on the fuse.

Old 05-11-2021, 11:53 AM
  #674  
Skunkwrks
Senior Member
 
Skunkwrks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 418
Received 66 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

My concern is releasing unburnt fuel into the air which happens will doing rolls, so a long overflow helps prevent and slow the fuel from being thrown out of the overflow vent.

My friend when he added a whole circle of the tube above his tank, it stopped the fuel from been thrown out of the vent, plus added additional flight time with no fuel down the fuselage from aerobatics.

Old 05-11-2021, 12:10 PM
  #675  
Dave Wilshere
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,120
Received 738 Likes on 532 Posts
Default

Out of tank, up high above tank in a loop, then straight down and out. Each way up the fuel head stops siphoning when the fuel draw is not high enough to stop it venting.
The following users liked this post:
DenisFerrari (08-06-2023)


Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.