Electronic solutions to modifying glow engines of all sizes to gasoline
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Electronic solutions to modifying glow engines of all sizes to gasoline
Continuation of the discussion about electronically solving carburation issues when converting glow engines to gasoline over on :censored:
Any and all questions can be placed here, and links to the files will be posted here within a few days.
We hope we can continue the discussion here without the interference we experienced over in :censored:
For now although the Github Wiki is still down, at least a preliminary link to the data and base information
GitHub - raleighcopter/my-mixture-controller: RC engine Fuel Mixture Controller
in :censored
Any and all questions can be placed here, and links to the files will be posted here within a few days.
We hope we can continue the discussion here without the interference we experienced over in :censored:
For now although the Github Wiki is still down, at least a preliminary link to the data and base information
GitHub - raleighcopter/my-mixture-controller: RC engine Fuel Mixture Controller
in :censored
The following users liked this post:
wolfiberkleid (02-20-2023)
#4
welcome, everyone. i will get the github wiki up in time. i've posted the source code and all the files that were on the github but the wiki is being more difficult and i'll probably need to rewrite the wiki pages. it'll probably take some time but i'll eventually get it back up. let's hope the trolls don't show up here.
#6
Chris, the regulator housing looks very nice. Will you be making them available to others?
Also, where will it be located In the fuel line? If the regulator is located before the solenoid I suspect that it will not sense fuel demand exactly as designed; If placed after the solenoid it seems it would then damp the solenoid pulses, losing the increased vaporization inherent to pulsed fuel delivery. Just my thoughts, and not very well educated ones at that.
Also, where will it be located In the fuel line? If the regulator is located before the solenoid I suspect that it will not sense fuel demand exactly as designed; If placed after the solenoid it seems it would then damp the solenoid pulses, losing the increased vaporization inherent to pulsed fuel delivery. Just my thoughts, and not very well educated ones at that.
The following users liked this post:
geodobilas (05-29-2024)
#8
what about measuring timing of demand?
On that regulator mount a tiny magnet on the lever and then measure its movements with a hall sensor.
Then you can open the solenoid synchronized with the fuel demand of the engine.
Would that work and help?
Then you can open the solenoid synchronized with the fuel demand of the engine.
Would that work and help?
#10
My thoughts as well. In an M-tronics carb the pump and the regulator precede the solenoid. The solenoid replaces the HS and LS needles and the solenoid and regulator are as close as can be to one another. In the case of a glow carb there's no way to get the two that cloise together. Partly what prompted my question.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
So I'd expect the regulator to not disturb things when placed in line before the solenoid. Whether it will work properly, IDK, but I have the feeling, Chris is going to surprise us with a "muffler pressure biased" regulator...
Guys, happy to see y'all here.
EDIT: dang, you guys are fast: I answered to Dave's reglator remark when I saw it and meanwhile three of you said the same. Not used to that over here... Normally it takes three weeks to get three additional responses here
Last edited by 1967brutus; 06-14-2022 at 12:42 PM.
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
But it MIGHT be usable (provided accuracy of the hall sensor allows it) to derive some sort of flow measurement out of that signal which either could be used for R&D, or possibly as a cascade control for fuel feed. I'd have to think about that.
But as it is, I'd say that cascade control simply is way too complicated.for our purpose.
#13
the way i assumed it would work
I don't think you can "sync" the solenoid with the regulator movement, because when the solenoid is closed, the regulator won't move.
But it MIGHT be usable (provided accuracy of the hall sensor allows it) to derive some sort of flow measurement out of that signal which either could be used for R&D, or possibly as a cascade control for fuel feed. I'd have to think about that.
But as it is, I'd say that cascade control simply is way too complicated.for our purpose.
But it MIGHT be usable (provided accuracy of the hall sensor allows it) to derive some sort of flow measurement out of that signal which either could be used for R&D, or possibly as a cascade control for fuel feed. I'd have to think about that.
But as it is, I'd say that cascade control simply is way too complicated.for our purpose.
And then if the regulator is open it passes the fuel while solenoid is closed, the solenoid will "see" the fuel tank pressure and block that so no fuel is passed to the carburator.
Close or do i overlook something?
#14
I don't think you can "sync" the solenoid with the regulator movement, because when the solenoid is closed, the regulator won't move.
But it MIGHT be usable (provided accuracy of the hall sensor allows it) to derive some sort of flow measurement out of that signal which either could be used for R&D, or possibly as a cascade control for fuel feed. I'd have to think about that.
But as it is, I'd say that cascade control simply is way too complicated.for our purpose.
But it MIGHT be usable (provided accuracy of the hall sensor allows it) to derive some sort of flow measurement out of that signal which either could be used for R&D, or possibly as a cascade control for fuel feed. I'd have to think about that.
But as it is, I'd say that cascade control simply is way too complicated.for our purpose.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
So its not that the regulator is opened and closed by the crankcase pressue.
And then if the regulator is open it passes the fuel while solenoid is closed, the solenoid will "see" the fuel tank pressure and block that so no fuel is passed to the carburator.
Close or do i overlook something?
And then if the regulator is open it passes the fuel while solenoid is closed, the solenoid will "see" the fuel tank pressure and block that so no fuel is passed to the carburator.
Close or do i overlook something?
The following users liked this post:
Rcplanedan (10-04-2023)
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#17
bert like this?
This is supposed to measure what went out of a tank
https://www.jetimodel.com/katalog/mflow2-gas-800-1.htm
And this might be able to measure the tank pressure
https://www.jetimodel.com/katalog/mb...scription-info
likely vrry expensive though..
https://www.jetimodel.com/katalog/mflow2-gas-800-1.htm
And this might be able to measure the tank pressure
https://www.jetimodel.com/katalog/mb...scription-info
likely vrry expensive though..
#19
have you tried this one?
frsky has this gas telemtry hub
https://www.frsky-rc.com/product/gas-suite/
https://www.t9hobbysport.com/frsky-g...rt-port-sensor £76 and shipping, import ect..
https://www.frsky-rc.com/product/gas-suite/
https://www.t9hobbysport.com/frsky-g...rt-port-sensor £76 and shipping, import ect..
#21
Senior Member
Thread Starter
frsky has this gas telemtry hub
https://www.frsky-rc.com/product/gas-suite/
https://www.t9hobbysport.com/frsky-g...rt-port-sensor £76 and shipping, import ect..
https://www.frsky-rc.com/product/gas-suite/
https://www.t9hobbysport.com/frsky-g...rt-port-sensor £76 and shipping, import ect..
As Dave said, it is for turbines or really large engines...It only works if minimum fuel consumption is above 20 ml/min. That means, at idle the engine should consume that in order to produce usable readout. My largest engine ( the 65 cc radial) barely manages that at full throttle...
#22
engines of ALL sizes? )
This is the buton (norvell) style glow plug adaptor but it does look promising.
The controll unit / and cdi / battery will be way to heavy to fly but be among the smallest ignition engines "out there"
anyway back to the original subject
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Now for that Cox engine, I am not really sure if the ball and socket would hold out on my standard 10:1 fuel/oil mix, but other than that, I am 100% positive that with a Runtronic ignition I can build something flyable, RC, with that engine. Not even really going to be a challenge. Won't be an exiting hotrodder, just a nice sport plane, but still, 100% sure it WILL fly as long as the engine doesn't wear out
But it will need something different than just a Norvel style glow plug adapter because the spark plug will really mess up the shape of the combustion chamber big time and that will kill a lot of power. Would not be surprised if that would need a custom made sparkplug,
The FP10 however, as you can see, runs fairly well, and that is still without the solenoid.
Last edited by 1967brutus; 06-14-2022 at 02:38 PM. Reason: Additional...
#24
does castor work with petrol?
That really is not too far fetched... I am working on a 1/2A project on gas, using an OS FP 10. Ignition weighs 40 grammes (Runtronic) and the single battery set-up will consist of a 2S 400 mAh LiPo. Won't provide much operational time, but I expect somewhere in the neighbourhood of 30 minutes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEvrEaYfws8
Now for that Cox engine, I am not really sure if the ball and socket would hold out on my standard 10:1 fuel/oil mix, but other than that, I am 100% positive that with a Runtronic ignition I can build something flyable, RC, with that engine. Not even really going to be a challenge. Won't be an exiting hotrodder, just a nice sport plane, but still, 100% sure it WILL fly as long as the engine doesn't wear out
But it will need something different than just a Norvel style glow plug adapter because the spark plug will really mess up the shape of the combustion chamber big time and that will kill a lot of power. Would not be surprised if that would need a custom made sparkplug,
The FP10 however, as you can see, runs fairly well, and that is still without the solenoid.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEvrEaYfws8
Now for that Cox engine, I am not really sure if the ball and socket would hold out on my standard 10:1 fuel/oil mix, but other than that, I am 100% positive that with a Runtronic ignition I can build something flyable, RC, with that engine. Not even really going to be a challenge. Won't be an exiting hotrodder, just a nice sport plane, but still, 100% sure it WILL fly as long as the engine doesn't wear out
But it will need something different than just a Norvel style glow plug adapter because the spark plug will really mess up the shape of the combustion chamber big time and that will kill a lot of power. Would not be surprised if that would need a custom made sparkplug,
The FP10 however, as you can see, runs fairly well, and that is still without the solenoid.
Standard compression of a cox is fairly high so a bigger space above the piston might not be such a huge disadvantage, assuming petrol needs a lower compression. 30 min flying time on that wing would be greath
#25
Am using 20% castor in my glow fuel would 20% castor also work wit petrol?
Standard compression of a cox is fairly high so a bigger space above the piston might not be such a huge disadvantage, assuming petrol needs a lower compression. 30 min flying time on that wing would be greath
Standard compression of a cox is fairly high so a bigger space above the piston might not be such a huge disadvantage, assuming petrol needs a lower compression. 30 min flying time on that wing would be greath
Yes, castor oil can be mixed with gas. Back in the day that's primarily what 2 stroke oil was.