Agrav8ed

I found this on thingiverse and printed it over the weekend on a lark. It was a great fit and seriously reduced the amount of grass inside my Rebel. Whomever designed it has my thanks.Tone

Desert Fox 1

Cheers!
Desert Fox 1

Ken Bryant

My Feedback: (10)

Folks, can you please post up your interior layouts. I’ll be getting my plane in a month or two depending on shipping container availability. I’m pretty sure I have all the goodies to go in it. But it helps looking at other folks installs. Also helps in planning my install.

Ken Bryant

My Feedback: (10)

Got pictures of my plane from CARF.

BarracudaHockey

My Feedback: (11)

Wicked!

sewbusy

Ken….I’ve been trying to upload a photo re your request, and have just been able to do so. This is how I did my setup on my Rebel Pro.
Wayne

Jannica

Hello everybody!

I´m thinking about ordering a Rebel Pro. I know that the recommended engine range is from 180 N to 210 N but I certainly don’t need an engine in the upper range. My style of flying is gentle and taking use of dynamic energy in all manoeuvres and I generally think that many of our RC-jets are monstrously over powered. I also fly from a generous grass field.

I have a Kingtech 140 N G2 lying around and I wonder if that would be enough for a Rebel Pro?

Has any of you flown a Rebel Pro with a smaller engine than the recommended 180 N? And if so, what are your experiences?

And no, The Classic is not an alternative.

Jannica
Sweden

Ken Bryant

My Feedback: (10)

I don’t imagine many if any have flown with a smaller engine than a 180. The smallest I can see get used would be a 170. I plan on using a Swiwin 190 and have been told the plane flies well with a 190.

Consider this, the average finished build comes in at 43lbs. The Kingtech 140 produces 32lbs thrust. The Kingtech 180 produces 35lbs thrust. The Swiwin 190 that I plan on is at 41. Swiwin 220 is at 48lbs.

Low power needs a very efficient wing and light wing loading. Possible, probably… enjoyable… not likely.

RC_MAN

My Feedback: (11)

Mine had a 210. It is well suited for the PRO especially on takeoff with a full tank. I think 190 would be marginal.

smcharg

My Feedback: (1)

One must always consider altitude. You can lose 20% at 3000 ft. If you're at sea level, a 210 might be great. If you're at 3500 ft. MSL, you may want a 230ish in there.

DAN AVILLA

My Feedback: (12)

I have a 190 SW in mine and I fly at 5000 ft . It has no problem. Just does not go vertical on take off. Dan