tmaxx exhaust?
10-06-2010, 05:18 PM
#4
RE: tmaxx exhaust?
With all due respect, I recommend you stay away from dual exhaust. Only reason, there is not enough back pressure to the fuel tank keep a proper tune. And they are 3X as loud as stock. Do they work, Yes. I bought one too thinking the same thing. But I made it half a tank and took it off and went back to stck. You can always get a piece of rubber hose and run it to the back from the exhaust out let. Or a exhaust deflector. This is only my opinion. From my own experience. Just one of the things you need to tollerate when you go Nitro.
10-06-2010, 10:08 PM
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: american fork, UT
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: tmaxx exhaust?
i agree ! i can tell you from personal experience, rear exhaust is not good !! (some poeple say that have good luck tsais brand rear exhaust)
all others , (and i mean ALOT ) hated thiers do to chasing a tune (i have read a lot of threads about this subject)
i have a exhaust deflector on my resonator pipe, that works great!!!!
all others , (and i mean ALOT ) hated thiers do to chasing a tune (i have read a lot of threads about this subject)
i have a exhaust deflector on my resonator pipe, that works great!!!!
10-09-2010, 01:10 AM
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: oxnard, CA
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: tmaxx exhaust?
I did this, I just put a high temp silicon hose and no preblems, this is in my ntc3 but i did the same in my t maxx, I did not notice any chance in performance, try it and if you dont like it just take it off....
you can see it in my tmaxx.
you can see it in my tmaxx.
10-09-2010, 01:33 PM
#7
RE: tmaxx exhaust?
Adding long exhaust extensions like that *USUALLY* hinders performance 1000-2000rpms. It will probably boost the low-end power a little bit, but hurt the top end. *Some* engines see a performance increase, but usually they're airplane engines.
If you want a better pipe, why not get a CVEC or TRX Blue anodized T-maxx pipe #TRA4942? http://www.ehobbies.com/tra4942.html
I used the #4942 pipe on a 2.5r and a 3.3 and it worked just as good as my neighbors with resonators. Its cheaper, too.
If you want a better pipe, why not get a CVEC or TRX Blue anodized T-maxx pipe #TRA4942? http://www.ehobbies.com/tra4942.html
I used the #4942 pipe on a 2.5r and a 3.3 and it worked just as good as my neighbors with resonators. Its cheaper, too.
10-09-2010, 05:33 PM
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Peoria,
AZ
Posts: 5,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: tmaxx exhaust?
do you have any under body shots of that on the tmaxx?
im not that much of a speed freak, so im fine with that, more torque is good though
ORIGINAL: boraboyntc3
I did this, I just put a high temp silicon hose and no preblems, this is in my ntc3 but i did the same in my t maxx, I did not notice any chance in performance, try it and if you dont like it just take it off....
you can see it in my tmaxx.
I did this, I just put a high temp silicon hose and no preblems, this is in my ntc3 but i did the same in my t maxx, I did not notice any chance in performance, try it and if you dont like it just take it off....
you can see it in my tmaxx.
Adding long exhaust extensions like that *USUALLY* hinders performance 1000-2000rpms. It will probably boost the low-end power a little bit, but hurt the top end. *Some* engines see a performance increase, but usually they're airplane engines.
If you want a better pipe, why not get a CVEC or TRX Blue anodized T-maxx pipe #TRA4942? http://www.ehobbies.com/tra4942.html
I used the #4942 pipe on a 2.5r and a 3.3 and it worked just as good as my neighbors with resonators. Its cheaper, too.
If you want a better pipe, why not get a CVEC or TRX Blue anodized T-maxx pipe #TRA4942? http://www.ehobbies.com/tra4942.html
I used the #4942 pipe on a 2.5r and a 3.3 and it worked just as good as my neighbors with resonators. Its cheaper, too.
