Community
Search
Notices
RC Car General Discussions This forum is for all general discussions related to radio control cars. Check forums below for more specific categories if applicable.

rear a-arms vs trailing arms?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-13-2005, 03:00 AM
  #1  
Deanb44
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Spanish Fork, UT
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default rear a-arms vs trailing arms?

I can't help but notice that most off-road rc cars use rear a-arms. Why do you think that a-arms are used over trailing arms?
Old 06-13-2005, 04:51 AM
  #2  
Ahab
Senior Member
 
Ahab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: , , UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: rear a-arms vs trailing arms?

my guess would be that it is to do with suspension geometry, A-arms keep the wheel angles/cambers Etc the same throughout the stroke.
older ('70s) off roaders are often pictured with trailing arms - esp on the front end.

ultimately I think it is that the technology has moved on.
Old 06-14-2005, 02:03 AM
  #3  
Deanb44
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Spanish Fork, UT
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: rear a-arms vs trailing arms?


ORIGINAL: Ahab

my guess would be that it is to do with suspension geometry, A-arms keep the wheel angles/cambers Etc the same throughout the stroke.
older ('70s) off roaders are often pictured with trailing arms - esp on the front end.
The camber is constantly changing with a-arms and this tire scrub cause excess tire rear. Trailing arm have less camber change but more caster change.

ORIGINAL: Ahab

ultimately I think it is that the technology has moved on.
That is just what I can't figure out. Why do rc cars use a-arms but most full scale buggies use trailing arms?
Old 06-14-2005, 07:00 PM
  #4  
Johnboy Walton
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Portland, ME
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: rear a-arms vs trailing arms?

Two words baby - "Ride Quality!"

RC's are unmanned, so ride quality is no concern. Furthermore, we don't particularly mind if the superlight RC chassis is bouncing all over the place - we can still see where we're going.

The reason is that (assuming it begins below level) when a trailing arm cycles upward to absorb an impact, it also moves rearward. This helps the obstacle to "slide" under the tire as opposed to forcing its way through as it would have to if the arm couldn't slide backward a bit (like an A-arm).

For the real thing, keeping the chassis level is important to seeing where you're going. In RC, even if the nose is 90* in the air, you can still very clearly see where you're going from the driver's stand.

So in short, a trailing arm "gets out of the way" of an obstacle (sacrificing tire contact for chassis stability), while an A-arm forces the chassis over the obstacle, which in general (especially on smoother surfaces) gives better overall handling.

Mike

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.