Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > ARF or RTF
Reload this Page >

Are some planes just really tail a or nose heavy?

Community
Search
Notices
ARF or RTF Discuss ARF (Almost Ready to Fly) radio control airplanes here.

Are some planes just really tail a or nose heavy?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-02-2008, 03:32 PM
  #1  
richb1492
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (4)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Beaumont, TX
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Are some planes just really tail a or nose heavy?

I just got back into flying and was changing out the packs and checking the rx in my Kadet Sr. ARf and remembered how tail heavy it is. After I put my new battery packs in and balanced it i though wow yeah still really tail heavy. So I decided to do like i did before and a roll of lead fishing weights.
Are some models just nose or tail heavy by design and you have too add a TOn of weight to balance them?
Old 05-02-2008, 03:47 PM
  #2  
*JCB*
My Feedback: (9)
 
*JCB*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Are some planes just really tail a or nose heavy?

In short, Yes. A lot of times it depends on the length of the nose vs the tail of the airplane which may cause lead to adding a bunch of weight. A good example is the Hangar 9 Sopwith, it actually comes with a slug of lead to put in the nose for balancing! I have never owned a Kadet, but the three Sig planes that I have do not need any lead to balance...
Old 05-02-2008, 03:49 PM
  #3  
MinnFlyer
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
MinnFlyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Willmar, MN
Posts: 28,519
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default RE: Are some planes just really tail a or nose heavy?

In a word - yes.

The Great Planes Seawind hs a nose full of BBs and epoxy and STILL I had to add about 1 1/2lbs (One and a half pounds) of lead to the nose
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Ay75389.jpg
Views:	13
Size:	83.3 KB
ID:	941538   Click image for larger version

Name:	Vq50230.jpg
Views:	11
Size:	72.1 KB
ID:	941539  
Old 05-02-2008, 04:18 PM
  #4  
carlosponti
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
carlosponti's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Are some planes just really tail a or nose heavy?

I had the World Models Frontier Senior as a trainer, its basically a copy of the Sig Senior with wider wing and ailerons. It called for a 45 size engine and I put a 61 supertiger which is 8 ounces heavier than the 45 supertiger. I still had to put lead in the nose to balance, more like take some of the lead that was already there out to compensate for a bigger engine that what was required as that i bought the plane used.
Old 05-02-2008, 10:20 PM
  #5  
LDM
My Feedback: (15)
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Denver, PA
Posts: 9,326
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Are some planes just really tail a or nose heavy?

Yeppi , lets see the Seafury , the Fw190 ect ect , all short nose warbirds can have a tail heavy issues but .... before you ever add weight do your best to move everything and the kitchen sink forward , switch your wheels to light wheels (if there on or behind the CG )
Then when you have to add weight consider a larger battery (i think you did this ) and the even if a larger engine is practicle
Old 05-03-2008, 04:55 AM
  #6  
da Rock
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Near Pfafftown NC
Posts: 11,517
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Are some planes just really tail a or nose heavy?

And then you have the Phoenix Sukhoi-31 in 46size that comes from the mfg with a lead slab hidden in the nose. Sukhoi31s aren't short nose, so it's not the fault of the airplane. The mfg didn't bother to build his product with light wood in the rear nor with lightening holes in the rear of the fuselage.
Old 05-03-2008, 02:50 PM
  #7  
mikekosatka
Senior Member
My Feedback: (7)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kingwood, TX
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Are some planes just really tail a or nose heavy?

In general, scale model airplanes are constructed differently than the real planes, and different materials. Full scale engines are much heavier per hp than a nitro methane/alcohol fueled motor and are designed for much longer life. So it's not suprising that a design that works full scale needs help as a minature to meet flying criteria. Another example is in the airfoils. A scale 40 size mustang P-51 would have razorblade thick wings and stablizers. What "looks right" doesn't always" fly right". An example is a CG Tiger 60... They tend to build "tail heavy" . If you shortened the fusealage to fly right it would look funny. I prefer to add a little weight or move batteries, fuel tanks, servos, etc. and have a pretty plane... specially if its an model of a real aircraft. " Don't get me started on Profiles.
Mike

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.