New Carden Yak.
#326
My Feedback: (52)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: valparaiso, IN
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Carden Yak.
Buzzard, I agree and I removed it. What else you want ? There is hardly a thread on here that another plane is'nt mentioned somewhere down the line, look at post 305 fpr example. Anyway, who cares....like I said it's gone so relax already will you.
#327
RE: New Carden Yak.
ORIGINAL: sb13
Buzzard, I agree and I removed it. What else you want ? There is hardly a thread on here that another plane is'nt mentioned somewhere down the line, look at post 305 fpr example. Anyway, who cares....like I said it's gone so relax already will you.
Buzzard, I agree and I removed it. What else you want ? There is hardly a thread on here that another plane is'nt mentioned somewhere down the line, look at post 305 fpr example. Anyway, who cares....like I said it's gone so relax already will you.
#328
My Feedback: (52)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: valparaiso, IN
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Carden Yak.
A commercial in the middle of a discussion...[:'(] Typed by Buzzard.
Over three hundred comments and this was your first, you're not even involved in this topic Buzzard but you have the nerve to come on and throw your 2 cents in which I doubt anyone cares about. Atleast not me so go else where and Buzzoff.
#331
RE: New Carden Yak.
Buzzard, I agree and I removed it. What else you want ? There is hardly a thread on here that another plane is'nt mentioned somewhere down the line, look at post 305 fpr example. Anyway, who cares....like I said it's gone so relax already will you.
Over three hundred comments and this was your first, you're not even involved in this topic Buzzard but you have the nerve to come on and throw your 2 cents in which I doubt anyone cares about. Atleast not me so go else where and Buzzoff.
Yes sir Terry!! Don't care much anymore what people think or say. I'm about finished with this giant scale crap at this point.
Draw your own conclusion's..Like I said "Wow", Buzz
Over three hundred comments and this was your first, you're not even involved in this topic Buzzard but you have the nerve to come on and throw your 2 cents in which I doubt anyone cares about. Atleast not me so go else where and Buzzoff.
Yes sir Terry!! Don't care much anymore what people think or say. I'm about finished with this giant scale crap at this point.
Draw your own conclusion's..Like I said "Wow", Buzz
#332
My Feedback: (52)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: valparaiso, IN
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Carden Yak.
Buzz, I'm not out to start anything. It's just a post combined with bad feelings which is'nt your fault so sorry for sounding like an ass toward you. And sorry about the wrong name, buzzard...lol i meant Buzzed.
#338
Hey Guys,
I recently finished a Carden Yak 54- 37% (re-build I acquired) and I currently have a 150cc in it to use for unlimited IMAC. I had planned to purchase a 170-176 w/cans and decided to use what I have.
I am wanting to run full length pipes on it. However, I am not sure the pipes will fit without removing some foam from the bottom?
The plane is currently set up for cans., I'd rather have the extra power of the pipes vs the cans. The plane will fly Unlimited on cans, but not with the authority needed for the unknowns today.
Anyone on here put pipes in a stock Carden 37% Yak 54 without any special pipe tunnels?
Thanks
Bill H.
I recently finished a Carden Yak 54- 37% (re-build I acquired) and I currently have a 150cc in it to use for unlimited IMAC. I had planned to purchase a 170-176 w/cans and decided to use what I have.
I am wanting to run full length pipes on it. However, I am not sure the pipes will fit without removing some foam from the bottom?
The plane is currently set up for cans., I'd rather have the extra power of the pipes vs the cans. The plane will fly Unlimited on cans, but not with the authority needed for the unknowns today.
Anyone on here put pipes in a stock Carden 37% Yak 54 without any special pipe tunnels?
Thanks
Bill H.