Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
Reload this Page >

A123's straight into receiver

Community
Search
Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

A123's straight into receiver

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-2010, 07:01 AM
  #26  
budchugger
Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
budchugger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: navarre, FL
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: A123's straight into receiver

I also have been running A123 bats for over two year with no regulator on all Hitec digital servos with not problems.
Old 06-21-2010, 09:03 AM
  #27  
SinCityJets
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 2,778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: A123's straight into receiver

I should probably clarify my statements.....everything I said about using A123's direct were reference real, genuine A123's, NOT LiFePO4 generic batteries. I have no experience with them, other than knowing that there are dozens of suppliers, and if they are anything like the dozens of LiPo suppliers, their quality can be significantly different.

I'm not saying they aren't any good, I just don't have any experience with them, or know their tolerance levels.

When in doubt, buy the real thing.

Chad
Old 06-21-2010, 11:03 AM
  #28  
David Jackson
My Feedback: (15)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,931
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: A123's straight into receiver


ORIGINAL: BaldEagel


ORIGINAL: David Jackson

This post could not have come at a better time. In the past two days I have managed to smoke 5 Hitec digital servos, (1)5955 and (4)5645s. In one day, four servos smoked in my 1/4 scale Corsair and one was lost in my F-4. In each case, dual A123 Racing 4800mah paks were used and attached to a Smartfly EQ10. Luckily, both planes were on the ground. [8D]
As far as I know A123's do not come in a muliple that will allow 4800Mah to be achived, are you sure of your cappacity and they are genuine A123's?

Mike
My mistake, the batteries are the A123 Racing 4600 mah pak. [8D]
Old 06-21-2010, 11:27 AM
  #29  
ww2birds
My Feedback: (14)
 
ww2birds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Katonah, NY
Posts: 1,368
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default RE: A123's straight into receiver

Does anyone here know the typical failure mode of A123s? Short? Open? Something else?

I see people recommending the technique of plugging two A123s via two switches directly into the receiver on two different channels. A very simple scheme, and very well proven with NiCds and NiMh's. In the case of those packs, the typical failure mode is for a cell to short, so you have a 4c and a 5c pack in parallel, and the voltage difference is only 20%, and not much current flows, and you can survive the failure. I use that setup on a lot of planes.

If the typical failure mode of a A123 cell is to short, then you have a 6V pack in parallel with a 3V pack and that does not sound really good, especially when the output impedance of the A123 is so low .. seems like a really bad idea. Now, if the typical failure mode is an open cell then this is no problem at all.

For now, I am using dual A123s only with some sort of active battery management (e.g. SmartFly).

Can someone with more insight into A123 behavior comment?

Thanks
Dave McQ
Old 06-21-2010, 11:45 AM
  #30  
SinCityJets
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 2,778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: A123's straight into receiver

Dave,

I have not heard of a A123 failure yet. Any A123 that I have seen that had to be replaced was user induced by over-charging/discharging. During the assembly of packs, I have witnessed cells being shorted. Aside from melting a hole in the side of the cell, from the near 120A discharge, the pack still worked and functioned just fine. I would never use those cells for flight packs, but it gives you some insight to the resilience of this battery technology.

Chad
Old 06-21-2010, 11:52 AM
  #31  
ww2birds
My Feedback: (14)
 
ww2birds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Katonah, NY
Posts: 1,368
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default RE: A123's straight into receiver

Chad,

Interesting comment. If that's true, then I guess there is no point in redundancy (2 packs) to improve reliability, just to increase the MaH capacity, in which case "hard paralleling" should be fine. If you parallel to gain reliability you do so with some idea of the failure mode. If there is none .. well that's cool :-)

Dave
Old 06-21-2010, 12:26 PM
  #32  
bigbri
My Feedback: (287)
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: dracut, MA
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: A123's straight into receiver

there is a failure mode for sure, Let me say I love 123's and use them often..but had a flameout with my p-80 not to long ago. ECU read "OC powerfail" which is often a low ECU battery...sure enough number 2 cell in a 3 cell pack was nearly dead (about 0.5 under a load. They were new batteries....The only real warning was when I charged them that cell was way under the others in voltage, but where it was a new pack I felt it just needed to be balance charged. Now the real question is how to tell if a pack is going to fail..WW2birds has a great question. anybody have the ancwer?
Old 06-21-2010, 03:09 PM
  #33  
SinCityJets
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 2,778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: A123's straight into receiver

I always run dual flight packs for the "what if" scenario. What if a cell goes dead, or I forgot to charge a pack, etc. While the technology is bulletproof, it may not be missile proof

Chad
Old 06-21-2010, 04:39 PM
  #34  
hoser
 
hoser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Miami Springs, FL
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default RE: A123's straight into receiver

i started this year using A123's on 2 on of my jets with a DX-7 no issues so far.
Old 06-21-2010, 08:42 PM
  #35  
streetrodder
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Irwin, PA
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: A123's straight into receiver

The other great thing is that these 2200 mah packs are $11 each.

Where are you getting 123"s for 11 bucks at??????
Old 06-21-2010, 08:57 PM
  #36  
baam1211
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: , TX
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: A123's straight into receiver

i am going to use a smart fly in a 1/4 scale yak 1 2200 a123 on rec a 100 for ingnition is there a need for dual rec batt with the 123 i am new at these batt was a nmih man any ideas or imput would be appr.
Old 06-21-2010, 08:58 PM
  #37  
baam1211
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: , TX
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: A123's straight into receiver

also i've never seen them for 11$
Old 06-21-2010, 08:59 PM
  #38  
baam1211
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: , TX
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: A123's straight into receiver

1100 for ign. can't type today
Old 06-21-2010, 10:19 PM
  #39  
David Jackson
My Feedback: (15)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,931
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: A123's straight into receiver

You only need dual paks for a little added insurance. Just as Chad mentioned earlier, for those,"What if," situations. As a rule, I use dual battery paks (4600mah each) in all my plane (jets and props), whether A123's or LiIons. Might be overkill and may not prevent system failure, but its just a habit for me.[8D]
Old 06-21-2010, 10:26 PM
  #40  
VF84sluggo
My Feedback: (55)
 
VF84sluggo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: A123's straight into receiver

How would you recommend rigging two batteries with an AR7000 RX? In my Hellcat recently ditched my 4-cell NiMH battery for an A123 after concerns about getting too close to triggering a low voltage lockout. But, reading this thread has got me thinking: In an L-39 I'm building, I'm using two A123's (AR9100RX, but it's set up for two batteries). If I'm doing it with the L-39, why not in my Hellcat? But how?
Old 06-21-2010, 10:36 PM
  #41  
David Jackson
My Feedback: (15)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,931
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: A123's straight into receiver

On my Bearcat with a JR 955 receiver (72mhz), I use two A123 paks. One is plugged into the battery slot and the other into an unused channel on the receiver. So far no problems. On my larger prop driven planes and jets, I use the Smartfly EQ 10 which has the built in slots for dual batteries. [8D]
Old 06-22-2010, 02:12 AM
  #42  
cavandish
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: christchurch, NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: A123's straight into receiver

ORIGINAL: streetrodder

The other great thing is that these 2200 mah packs are $11 each.

Where are you getting 123''s for 11 bucks at??????
http://www.sdshobby.com/2s1p-a123-66...ry-p-1151.html


http://www.cyclonetoy.com/

My packs have had 5 perfect cycles and about 15 top ups, all four take about 300 mah after 5 flights.
they are 'real' 123s.

Email Vivianne [email protected]

request an invoice inclusive of air postage (this is from china) tell her John from christchurch, New Zealand recomended cyclone.

I bought 4 packs I should of got 12 !

I have the 25 kg servos ($11) in two Giant scale planes with a couple of hundred flights between them, I would not trust them in a Jet though !

lots of other good stuff on there, Dl 222 is less than a grand.
Old 06-22-2010, 07:39 AM
  #43  
VF84sluggo
My Feedback: (55)
 
VF84sluggo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: A123's straight into receiver


ORIGINAL: David Jackson

On my Bearcat with a JR 955 receiver (72mhz), I use two A123 paks. One is plugged into the battery slot and the other into an unused channel on the receiver. So far no problems. On my larger prop driven planes and jets, I use the Smartfly EQ 10 which has the built in slots for dual batteries. [8D]
Ok, thanks. My switching setup right now has the battery going to the switch/charge port on the fuselage side, then to the RX. Not sure how I'd hook two batts into that...not sure if putting two A123's on a 'Y' and then into the switch is prudent. Probably need the EQ10.
Old 06-22-2010, 08:12 AM
  #44  
bcovish
My Feedback: (8)
 
bcovish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 5,324
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: A123's straight into receiver


ORIGINAL: VF84sluggo


ORIGINAL: David Jackson

On my Bearcat with a JR 955 receiver (72mhz), I use two A123 paks. One is plugged into the battery slot and the other into an unused channel on the receiver. So far no problems. On my larger prop driven planes and jets, I use the Smartfly EQ 10 which has the built in slots for dual batteries. [8D]
Ok, thanks. My switching setup right now has the battery going to the switch/charge port on the fuselage side, then to the RX. Not sure how I'd hook two batts into that...not sure if putting two A123's on a 'Y' and then into the switch is prudent. Probably need the EQ10.
Use a second switch and charge port then plug both into the RX
Old 06-22-2010, 09:52 AM
  #45  
highhorse
My Feedback: (2)
 
highhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 2,571
Received 94 Likes on 50 Posts
Default RE: A123's straight into receiver


ORIGINAL: bcovish


ORIGINAL: VF84sluggo


ORIGINAL: David Jackson

On my Bearcat with a JR 955 receiver (72mhz), I use two A123 paks. One is plugged into the battery slot and the other into an unused channel on the receiver. So far no problems. On my larger prop driven planes and jets, I use the Smartfly EQ 10 which has the built in slots for dual batteries. [8D]
Ok, thanks. My switching setup right now has the battery going to the switch/charge port on the fuselage side, then to the RX. Not sure how I'd hook two batts into that...not sure if putting two A123's on a 'Y' and then into the switch is prudent. Probably need the EQ10.
Use a second switch and charge port then plug both into the RX
That's a good setup in that u get switch redundancy as well, but with SOME switches there will be charging issues unless one batt is unplugged from the switch or rx first.

I'm having that problem on one setup now, though I don't remember what brand of switches they are. U need to use switches which have no common ground between charge and rx side.
Old 06-22-2010, 02:02 PM
  #46  
BaldEagel
 
BaldEagel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kent, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 9,672
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default RE: A123's straight into receiver

I use two A123 batteries into two Fromeco Kodiak switches into the Rx, the Kodiak switches have a digital display that tells you how many Mah you have used during your flight and are fail on, use Deans plugs, and are very pretty. LOL. if you have a Futaba 6014 then the use of an Orbit power jack will neaten the whole thing up as well.

Mike
Old 06-22-2010, 05:40 PM
  #47  
VF84sluggo
My Feedback: (55)
 
VF84sluggo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: A123's straight into receiver

Thanks guys!

Sluggo
Old 06-22-2010, 10:31 PM
  #48  
gooseF22
 
gooseF22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 2,603
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default RE: A123's straight into receiver


ORIGINAL: mavrick

HI Guys Is anyone running A123's straight into there receiver's, So far I have been using a Turbo Reg set at 5.9 into my AR9100's but can't see much point as a fully charged 5cell
is over 7 Volts if you can run the batteries straight into the receiver it is something less to go wrong. All my servo's are Hitec 645's and 5645's just like to get your view's.
Mav
Yes MANY times. no issues. have run that exact setup. No worries mate. My rookie is 2x A123's into the 9100 with hitecs.

Wire it direct., reg not needed
Old 06-22-2010, 10:39 PM
  #49  
gooseF22
 
gooseF22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 2,603
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default RE: A123's straight into receiver


ORIGINAL: SinCityJets

Dave,

I have not heard of a A123 failure yet. Any A123 that I have seen that had to be replaced was user induced by over-charging/discharging. During the assembly of packs, I have witnessed cells being shorted. Aside from melting a hole in the side of the cell, from the near 120A discharge, the pack still worked and functioned just fine. I would never use those cells for flight packs, but it gives you some insight to the resilience of this battery technology.

Chad
I have had a few A123 packs fail in testing, but every and I mean every failure was traced back to improper handling or charging or soldering. If you buy a welded pack from reputable folks, AND balance charge it, it will last forever. I have one pack that is on its 5th airplane. Currently in a rookie. It was one of my original test packs from Fromeco.

The failures are all related to allowing the pack to get out of balance and then subsequently overcharging accidently and failing the cell. If you allow a cell to pop or get above about 4.3 volts, it will die a slow death and then the other cell becomes vulnerable for overcharge. they will hold a small charge fooling you but if you use a blinky or balance charger, it will find that problem right now.

I have tested the A123's to the failure point. they are very durable and provide power when damaged pretty good. We drove a nail through one at 50 amps. It lost 4 amps but kept on providing power. It vented a bit too. If an A123 vents from overcharging, it have a /VERY pungent smell. I was able to get over 5 volts in the cell before it got hot enough to melt the tape around it. It still did not explode, just vented.

SO... what Im saying is the battery is very safe, but as a receiver pack, you must balance charge it often because the discharge curve is so flat, it will creep out of balance if you dont, and you will eventually overcharge one cell. so get the bal charger or blinky and you will have years of reliable service. None of my packs have failed from general usage, only mistakes or intentional testing.

Old 06-22-2010, 10:41 PM
  #50  
gooseF22
 
gooseF22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 2,603
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default RE: A123's straight into receiver


ORIGINAL: bcovish


ORIGINAL: VF84sluggo


ORIGINAL: David Jackson

On my Bearcat with a JR 955 receiver (72mhz), I use two A123 paks. One is plugged into the battery slot and the other into an unused channel on the receiver. So far no problems. On my larger prop driven planes and jets, I use the Smartfly EQ 10 which has the built in slots for dual batteries. [8D]
Ok, thanks. My switching setup right now has the battery going to the switch/charge port on the fuselage side, then to the RX. Not sure how I'd hook two batts into that...not sure if putting two A123's on a 'Y' and then into the switch is prudent. Probably need the EQ10.
Use a second switch and charge port then plug both into the RX
+1


Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.