Rc nitro turbo
#126
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Theresa, WI
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Rc nitro turbo
Sorry I did not wanna stop the discussion, just was processing the snowmobile influence and put down what came to mind. Having a drive and driven clutch would enable you to tune our engines into a specific rpm range, exactly what a two stroke is good for. If you could keep the engine turning at the rpm that it makes the most tork while it is propelling the car/truck to it's max speed would be ideal in theory. This was a responce to the 4 speed idea, which aint that bad of an idea. Just seems like to many moving parts to me....
#127
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Somerset, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 2,324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Rc nitro turbo
ORIGINAL: Ttowntoolman
Sorry I did not wanna stop the discussion, just was processing the snowmobile influence and put down what came to mind. Having a drive and driven clutch would enable you to tune our engines into a specific rpm range, exactly what a two stroke is good for. If you could keep the engine turning at the rpm that it makes the most tork while it is propelling the car/truck to it's max speed would be ideal in theory. This was a responce to the 4 speed idea, which aint that bad of an idea. Just seems like to many moving parts to me....
Sorry I did not wanna stop the discussion, just was processing the snowmobile influence and put down what came to mind. Having a drive and driven clutch would enable you to tune our engines into a specific rpm range, exactly what a two stroke is good for. If you could keep the engine turning at the rpm that it makes the most tork while it is propelling the car/truck to it's max speed would be ideal in theory. This was a responce to the 4 speed idea, which aint that bad of an idea. Just seems like to many moving parts to me....
I have to ask the question of why would you want/need four gears, if you are adding more gears why not have five/six/seven....? (picture by ziggy)
#128
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Theresa, WI
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Rc nitro turbo
Yea and any slip at these rpms would just eat belts like nothing. Besides the cost of the drive and driven pullies most likely will cost more than the model we wish to propel.
#129
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kingston UK, but living in Athens, GREECE
Posts: 18,082
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
RE: Rc nitro turbo
I was going to mention CVTs as well, but guys, the problem here is that we are discussing a future technology to support a future technology, to improve a dying technoology (combustion engines). I'm all for discussion, but even if we hit on the perfect solution (someone manages to come up with at least a working theory on nitro turbo, and then subsequently a transmission that can keep it in the powerband), it's going to take many years to bring it to market. In say, 7 years, brushless technology will have reached insane levels, it already outstrips one of the most mature technologies we know of (combustion engines), and it's still in its infancy.
So yeh, all nice theories, but we are never gonna see this stuff in the hobby, on a shelf. It's too late now.
So yeh, all nice theories, but we are never gonna see this stuff in the hobby, on a shelf. It's too late now.
#131
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: sterling heights,
MI
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Rc nitro turbo
keeping an electric motor in its torque band draws high amps. amps=heat, so operation on a constant basis in that area of its powerband would be a waste. utilize the CVT reduction to provide the torque needed with minimal motor current.
so we're done with turbos now?
so we're done with turbos now?
#133
RE: Rc nitro turbo
ORIGINAL: savagecommander
keeping an electric motor in its torque band draws high amps. amps=heat, so operation on a constant basis in that area of its powerband would be a waste. utilize the CVT reduction to provide the torque needed with minimal motor current.
so we're done with turbos now?
keeping an electric motor in its torque band draws high amps. amps=heat, so operation on a constant basis in that area of its powerband would be a waste. utilize the CVT reduction to provide the torque needed with minimal motor current.
so we're done with turbos now?
I allways thought the CVT, transmissions were ment to keep the motor neer its max torque...
a brushless motor is like a petrol motor, more heat is created in its sweet spot, so what? increase the cooling system
rember volts x amps = power.... the hotter it is, the more power its been putting out
Dont know why u would use a CVT for reduction, brushless motors have pleanty of torque, might be use full for a crawler....cant see how?
I can see uses to use it as a overdrive, u could get something extreemly fast
#134
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: sterling heights,
MI
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Rc nitro turbo
volts x amps=power, but there are a host of other formulas that come into play that you are neglecting. no, a BL motor is nothing like a petrol motor- BL torque is proportional to current, maximum current is at stall. Yes, a hotter motor means more power, but that doesnt directly relate to the motor converting that energy onto mechanical work.
#135
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kingston UK, but living in Athens, GREECE
Posts: 18,082
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
RE: Rc nitro turbo
Indeed. Heat is in fact loss. At peak torque output an electric motor is least efficient.
Whether or not a CVT (or in fact any kind of rtransmission) would be of benefit to an electric system depends on the electric system. A massively torquey, low rpm system would obviously benefit from a gearbox to give amore usable range of rpm at the driving wheels, however a less torquey high rpm system, may not benefit at all, due to the fact that electric motor torque is almost linear.
Whether or not a CVT (or in fact any kind of rtransmission) would be of benefit to an electric system depends on the electric system. A massively torquey, low rpm system would obviously benefit from a gearbox to give amore usable range of rpm at the driving wheels, however a less torquey high rpm system, may not benefit at all, due to the fact that electric motor torque is almost linear.
#136
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: sterling heights,
MI
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Rc nitro turbo
For one thing, it would eliminate the huge startup spike, and if you had the right combination of motor/CVT you could keep motor rpm almost constant. that would keep current draw constant, increase runtime and efficiency