Community
Search
Notices
Gas Engines Questions or comments about gas engines can be posted here

Qudra 52

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-01-2008, 08:36 PM
  #1  
hanko
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: , MI
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Qudra 52

Anyone know how to make these engine put out better. Im only getting 6400 with a 20-10 wood prop on a 30 SD yak. that prop was recomended by benett the guy I bought it from. Shouldnt that engine hit 7500 on that prop. 40 to 1 Klotz gas
Old 09-01-2008, 08:40 PM
  #2  
rcnutstoo
My Feedback: (13)
 
rcnutstoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rockton IL
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Qudra 52

I have a q50 getting 6200 with a22x10 pro zinger. What brand prop are you using?Fuel?Oil?etc.
Old 09-02-2008, 07:27 AM
  #3  
hanko
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: , MI
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Qudra 52

Zinger, same as you. 20-10 as I stated in my post 40 to 1 Klotz. I was wondering if a 20- 6-10 would let it rev
Old 09-02-2008, 04:52 PM
  #4  
rcnutstoo
My Feedback: (13)
 
rcnutstoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rockton IL
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Qudra 52

Ok, I tried a 22x610 and didnt like the performance. I have a 19# lanier Cap232 my engine weighs about 5.25# its a pig Dick Bennett told me to run a 22x10 I get pretty good performance but not like DA50 or similar my buddies planes have way better vertical. they also run Vess and Xoar props. you should be running premium fuel, I like Amoco Gold best get it at BP. You should have about 120psi compression if you dont that might be the problem. How old is the engine? mine is about 250 years old or maybe old as dirt but it still runs good it just heavy and doesnt have the power of the new class 50cc engines most new engine are reed vale some rotary but the quadra is piston port, (old shcool) technology they're better suited to scale planes. What plane do you have it on?
Old 09-03-2008, 06:26 AM
  #5  
hanko
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: , MI
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Qudra 52

its on a 30% yak 17lbs. Im gonna try the 20 6-10 tonight and lean it a little. Its a new engine. maybe 3 24 oz tanks through it
Old 09-03-2008, 06:23 PM
  #6  
rcnutstoo
My Feedback: (13)
 
rcnutstoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rockton IL
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Qudra 52

If its new that probably why you're not getting r's it take 3-4 gals of fuel to really get run in good
Old 09-03-2008, 09:00 PM
  #7  
Truckracer
My Feedback: (19)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 5,358
Received 44 Likes on 43 Posts
Default RE: Qudra 52

ORIGINAL: rcnutstoo

How old is the engine? mine is about 250 years old or maybe old as dirt but it still runs good it just heavy and doesnt have the power of the new class 50cc engines most new engine are reed vale some rotary but the quadra is piston port, (old shcool) technology they're better suited to scale planes.
Just because an engine has piston port induction, don't assume it is low performance or "old school"! Check out a Taurus TS-52 or any good Sachs based engine. And certainly don't overlook the good old G-62 or any one of dozens of other quality .... high performance, piston ported engines. All of the Brillelli (now out of production) engines were piston ported engines and they were noted for being top performers.

Yes, by comparison the older design Quadra engines lack performance .... but not because they are piston ported!
Old 09-04-2008, 08:20 PM
  #8  
GreaTOne_65
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Webberville, MI
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Qudra 52

Truckracer, I've got a Quadra 52, that I changed the jug around . The airplane I wanted to put it in had a Fox 3.2 that had the carb on the other side, so I turned the jug and piston 180 degress and after turning it, it now turns an 18X8-14 73-7400 rpms. When the carb was on the other side it only ran 66-6700. Hanko and I have discussed this, wonder if it's a fluke or is there something to turning the jug around?
Anybody else ever try it? I would be interested if sombody else would try it to see what happens.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.