Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > ARF or RTF
Reload this Page >

Quick Question

Community
Search
Notices
ARF or RTF Discuss ARF (Almost Ready to Fly) radio control airplanes here.

Quick Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-2008, 05:16 PM
  #1  
Shouter
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Mayville, ND
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Quick Question

I have a Dave Patrick Ultimate .40. I love it! But the problem is when you give it "too much" elevator, it wants to snap out of it. Is this a CG problem?
Old 08-07-2008, 05:18 PM
  #2  
fancman
Senior Member
My Feedback: (16)
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: N. Charleston, SC
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Quick Question

Most likely. Move cg forward and or reduce control surface throw.
Old 08-07-2008, 06:10 PM
  #3  
da Rock
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Near Pfafftown NC
Posts: 11,517
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Quick Question


ORIGINAL: north dakota kid

I have a Dave Patrick Ultimate .40. I love it! But the problem is when you give it "too much" elevator, it wants to snap out of it. Is this a CG problem?

Ultimates are designed to snap and do the aerobatics that require a stalled wing. Lots of airplanes are. They have tapered wings since that planform naturally stalls from the tip and elevators that are sufficiently powerful to pitch the wing into a stall AOA.

The plane is doing what it was designed to do. The way to deal with it is what most do. Setup dual rates on the elevator and use it. You test fly to find the amount of elevator throw causes you the snap problem. Then you set your low rates to give just a bit less than that throw. You will then have high rate elevator to do all the snappy maneuvers and low rate to do all your milder flying.

Many of the aerobatic designs really suffer overall with a too far forward CG. The tapered wings don't change where they stall with different CGs. They're still going to stall from the tip. And as the CG is moved forward the overall efficiency of the airplane suffers. The stall speed actually increases, as does induced drag.

With a lot of these planes, you'll find that the suggested elevator throw is really not needed. Rigging for less throw gives a model that winds up flying better, more efficiently, and with no change in stability. And of course, an elevator stick movement that is more comfortable.
Old 08-07-2008, 10:25 PM
  #4  
Shouter
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Mayville, ND
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Quick Question

Wow, thanks so much for that explaination. I will do what you recommended. Again thanks!
So the same thing happens to my Funtana .40, is that a cg problem then?

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.