New Tongde Bradley
#6
I'm going to wait and see on this one...
#9
Looks pretty cool.
#10
That is the TOW missile launcher that pops up on the left side of the turret, right? That's a very cool little feature. In the military I occasionally got a chance to ride front seat in a Cobra and the pilot would always let me play with the TSU, the telescopic sighting unit for the TOW. I also got to see them fired when I would stand guard duty at the range. Afterwards a long line of us would shuffle across the range to collect up all the wire from the missiles. Those things look very cool when they're fired. So who knows what TOW stands for?
#11
Tube-Launched, Optically Tracked, Wire-Guided, now they have a newer TOW 2A and 2B versions. The 2B has a version that uses an RF signal for guidance to the target:
TOW 2B RF anti-tank missile
Another development of the TOW 2B Aero, the wireless TOW 2B RF is in production. TOW 2B RF is modified with a one-way, stealthy radio-frequency command link, which dispenses with the wire link and gives a range of 4.5km. The system is compatible with current launchers.
#13
#14
Regarding the Bushmaster fire rate, it appears to be linked to the machine gun circuit on the TD board. The TOW seems to be linked to the main gun circuit. I'm told the IR circuit is in the TOW launcher (see the hole to the left?) TD is using their existing electronics rather than starting from scratch. Bad for authenticity but good for cost, for us and them.
#15
When the launcher your drops down you can see the light. That must be the IR circuit. Probably can't see it in person but it shows up on the video.
#17
Regarding the IR in Tongde tanks, I tried to use the Tongde mfu or whatever the tank control board is called.
It only fires IR with the machine gun, not the main cannon.
I also rigged up a Legodei IR unit to the tank and it would receive one hit then stop, It sometimes received a second hit then stopped. But basically didn’t work beyond that.
I tested two different boards.
If they are using the same board program in the Bradley it’s not going to work and you’re going to need an aftermarket board to make it work, which will bring up a lot of issues.
My point, don’t be surprised if you can’t use this for IR battles without a ton of modification and more money for an aftermarket board.
#18
Junior Member
I built the tow launcher from brass tubing and junk bits. It as a close facsimile not having a lot of reference in the mid 90s. I used very small model rocket motors and made foam nose cones. Without fins, it kinda went where it wanted. I dented a washing machine in a neighbors garage and lit a pine tree on fire.
the Bushmaster in the Tongde looks too short and the muzzle break too large. goona hide and watch on this one. already have my hands full trying to make lemonade out of a new Leo 2A4 by Hooben I received a couple weeks ago. so much potential there but so much that’s off.
#19
Have you seen what I've been doing with bottle rockets? The 1/6 nebelwerfer has been successfully tested (1/2 inch rockets) and now needs to go on a base with remote firing gear. The plan is to use an old taigen mfu (I have buckets full of mfus and TXs) and an igniter from estes, just wire it to a motor port and when you push right stick all the way it gives plenty of juice to touch things off. I also succssefully tested a 1/16 launcher with 1/4 inch rockets, and I have a 1/16 4x4 pick-up (maybe toyota, it's from jjrc) so I want to mount an mlrs in the back, but I still need to build the mounts and framwork. The tube assembly is done and tested, two rows stacked, six tubes per row. I've seen photos of real pick-ups that have been so modified that are fighting in Ukraine. All the videos for those projects are up at my YT channel if you're curious. Let me know if you need a link. The nebelwerfer looks especially cool when all six tubes go one after another, and the rockets I use give a nice bang at the other end.
The following users liked this post:
Hackworth (07-16-2023)
#20
Junior Member
I’m sold! please share a link. tried searching YT by your name here, but no joy. was an MLRS M270 crew member a billion years ago in the US Army. love the SPLL.
#21
The following 2 users liked this post by tankme:
Hackworth (07-16-2023),
RichJohnson (07-17-2023)
#22
These are for 1/16. These tubes would probably work in the M270 above, just separate them. But I'm planning to mount this unit on this truck
Of course it will be painted and all that, and I think I have a remote launching system worked out, if the winch circuit on the new truck boards will put out enough juice.
And the launcher unit
Then there's the 1/6 nebelwerfer
Next I want to pick up another 1/6 rochobby jeep and build one of these
Of course it will be painted and all that, and I think I have a remote launching system worked out, if the winch circuit on the new truck boards will put out enough juice.
And the launcher unit
Then there's the 1/6 nebelwerfer
Next I want to pick up another 1/6 rochobby jeep and build one of these
The following users liked this post:
Hackworth (07-16-2023)
#23
Junior Member
tankme very nice — thank you for sharing. incidentally the SPLL shares the same chassis as the Bradley (plus 1 road wheel and a little longer).
a little constructive criticism about the model: the 6-packs of rockets should all look like the rear of the rocket side in the video. the front and back are sealed. also, ATACMS looks exactly like the standard 6-pack. they don’t look any different until the missile escapes the pod.
a little constructive criticism about the model: the 6-packs of rockets should all look like the rear of the rocket side in the video. the front and back are sealed. also, ATACMS looks exactly like the standard 6-pack. they don’t look any different until the missile escapes the pod.
#24
#25
tankme very nice — thank you for sharing. incidentally the SPLL shares the same chassis as the Bradley (plus 1 road wheel and a little longer).
a little constructive criticism about the model: the 6-packs of rockets should all look like the rear of the rocket side in the video. the front and back are sealed. also, ATACMS looks exactly like the standard 6-pack. they don’t look any different until the missile escapes the pod.
a little constructive criticism about the model: the 6-packs of rockets should all look like the rear of the rocket side in the video. the front and back are sealed. also, ATACMS looks exactly like the standard 6-pack. they don’t look any different until the missile escapes the pod.
The following users liked this post:
Hackworth (07-16-2023)