Oxygene
#1
Thread Starter
Oxygene
Hello
New plane designed by Arnaud Poyet member french F3A Team and built by Hui Yang.
Awesome design.
https://www.facebook.com/oxygenF3A/?__tn__=HHH-R
https://www.hobbynet-jp.com/?pid=149523540
claude
New plane designed by Arnaud Poyet member french F3A Team and built by Hui Yang.
Awesome design.
https://www.facebook.com/oxygenF3A/?__tn__=HHH-R
https://www.hobbynet-jp.com/?pid=149523540
claude
Last edited by papaone; 03-30-2020 at 06:53 AM.
#6
Oxygene and Akuma + seems to be very similar, if not the same, model.
__________________
Ricardo Mendez Turell
__________________
Ricardo Mendez Turell
But I think both designs are really great.
Greetings
Gerhard
#7
#9
#10
I would say normally wing 0.5 - 0.7 degrees positive, stab @ zero.
Motor 0.5 - 2.0 degrees negative depending on plane and preferences.
If plane is on the heavy side and/or wing area is small maybe 1.0 degree is needed.
Motor 0.5 - 2.0 degrees negative depending on plane and preferences.
If plane is on the heavy side and/or wing area is small maybe 1.0 degree is needed.
#12
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hello,
I have a question about the center of gravity/ C.G. for the Super Oxygen
There are very different informations:
Oxygen : 270 mm
Website F3a unlimited and Aerobertics for the Super Oxygen: 274 mm
Website Hui Yang for the Super Oxygen: 320 mm !
These are already very big differences between the information of the website of Hui Yang and the others.
Which one is the right, does anybody knows the right CG?
Thank you very much.
Best regards
Jochen
I have a question about the center of gravity/ C.G. for the Super Oxygen
There are very different informations:
Oxygen : 270 mm
Website F3a unlimited and Aerobertics for the Super Oxygen: 274 mm
Website Hui Yang for the Super Oxygen: 320 mm !
These are already very big differences between the information of the website of Hui Yang and the others.
Which one is the right, does anybody knows the right CG?
Thank you very much.
Best regards
Jochen
#14
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hello Arnaud,
thank you for the quick answer, thats how I try it.
Are the other settinges for the Super Oxygen unchanged to the former Oxygen?
stab at 0°, wing at 0,8°, Adverrun contra at 0°.
Did I measure correct, the fuselage front ist – 1 °.
Thanks
Best regards
Jochen
thank you for the quick answer, thats how I try it.
Are the other settinges for the Super Oxygen unchanged to the former Oxygen?
stab at 0°, wing at 0,8°, Adverrun contra at 0°.
Did I measure correct, the fuselage front ist – 1 °.
Thanks
Best regards
Jochen
#17
Senior Member
#21
Senior Member
Ok let me ask this in a different way...
If the airframe has a build in down thrust of negative one degree relative to the theoretical thrust line and the wing is set at positive .8 degrees relative to this line....does the airframe now have a down thrust of 1.8 degrees or is it still 1.0 degrees .
If the airframe has a build in down thrust of negative one degree relative to the theoretical thrust line and the wing is set at positive .8 degrees relative to this line....does the airframe now have a down thrust of 1.8 degrees or is it still 1.0 degrees .
#22
My Feedback: (4)
Ok let me ask this in a different way...
If the airframe has a build in down thrust of negative one degree relative to the theoretical thrust line and the wing is set at positive .8 degrees relative to this line....does the airframe now have a down thrust of 1.8 degrees or is it still 1.0 degrees .
If the airframe has a build in down thrust of negative one degree relative to the theoretical thrust line and the wing is set at positive .8 degrees relative to this line....does the airframe now have a down thrust of 1.8 degrees or is it still 1.0 degrees .
Ask yourself this. Is the wing incidence the datum line?
#23
Senior Member
#25
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2024
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi!
I am tentatively interested in this plane. Can someone please tell me how it flies compared to other modern F3A monoplanes? Is the fuselage so high that it is difficult to see the position of the wings? How does the plane fly compared to modern F3A biplanes? Does the swept wing design help with integrated rolls?
I am tentatively interested in this plane. Can someone please tell me how it flies compared to other modern F3A monoplanes? Is the fuselage so high that it is difficult to see the position of the wings? How does the plane fly compared to modern F3A biplanes? Does the swept wing design help with integrated rolls?