F-104 as first turbine jet? : )
#1
Thread Starter
F-104 as first turbine jet? : )
Here's my deal. Years of R/C experience. 3D, speed planes, etc. Have flown many EDF jets (F-104's included), and have a 199.5 mph Weston Magnum with a Nelson on it so I have lots of experience with planes that have next to no wing area and glide like bricks. I also have excellent eyesight and can judge aircraft orientation better than most from my experience.
All I don't have is experience with turbine lag (outside the sim of course). This isn't quite the noob who wants to jump right into a P-51, but I wanted to know what you guys thought. -Chris
All I don't have is experience with turbine lag (outside the sim of course). This isn't quite the noob who wants to jump right into a P-51, but I wanted to know what you guys thought. -Chris
#2
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Gold Coast, Queensland, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 1,472
Received 26 Likes
on
24 Posts
RE: F-104 as first turbine jet? : )
Mate,
No problem, if you can see it (don't fly it too far away) and you know how to use a throttle to control altitude and attitute (not elevator), then you will have no problem. Many years ago my second turbine was a Philips Avonds F-104 and I had absolutely no problem with it. Have fun, if the F-104 you fly as your first turbine is anything as good as the one I flew, you will enjoy it.
Cheers,
Jan
No problem, if you can see it (don't fly it too far away) and you know how to use a throttle to control altitude and attitute (not elevator), then you will have no problem. Many years ago my second turbine was a Philips Avonds F-104 and I had absolutely no problem with it. Have fun, if the F-104 you fly as your first turbine is anything as good as the one I flew, you will enjoy it.
Cheers,
Jan
#4
Thread Starter
RE: F-104 as first turbine jet? : )
ORIGINAL: Springbok Flyer
Mate,
No problem, if you can see it (don't fly it too far away) and you know how to use a throttle to control altitude and attitute (not elevator), then you will have no problem. Many years ago my second turbine was a Philips Avonds F-104 and I had absolutely no problem with it. Have fun, if the F-104 you fly as your first turbine is anything as good as the one I flew, you will enjoy it.
Cheers,
Jan
Mate,
No problem, if you can see it (don't fly it too far away) and you know how to use a throttle to control altitude and attitute (not elevator), then you will have no problem. Many years ago my second turbine was a Philips Avonds F-104 and I had absolutely no problem with it. Have fun, if the F-104 you fly as your first turbine is anything as good as the one I flew, you will enjoy it.
Cheers,
Jan
#5
Thread Starter
RE: F-104 as first turbine jet? : )
ORIGINAL: Vincent
Which 104 are you looking at buying??
Vin...
Which 104 are you looking at buying??
Vin...
#7
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sailing in the Eastern Caribbean
Posts: 4,045
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
RE: F-104 as first turbine jet? : )
I had an Avonds F104 as my second jet it flew like a dream 14.5 lbs dry with a Wren SS but it was easy to get disorientated and it needed care on landings. I was glad that I had gone with a Boomer as my first jet not because I needed to fly the boomer but to learn about turbine operation.
If you are used to landing high wing loading models say a WW2 fighter then you should be OK PROVIDING you build it light AND you fly with a buddy who has turbine operation experience.
If you are used to landing high wing loading models say a WW2 fighter then you should be OK PROVIDING you build it light AND you fly with a buddy who has turbine operation experience.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Nottingham, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: F-104 as first turbine jet? : )
I have an Avonds 104 and its by far my fav model ... likes straight lines though, you really need to yank the turns but its great - cant speak for other 104s - but as first turbine? Depends on you experience and guts I guess but def as 2nd one ... Flying a 104 makes flying an F15 and such like dull ...
Like every plane, dedication to what ever you decided to do is the key - take off, turn or land ... any hesitation or split decision on a 104 could leave you in a nasty predicament ...
Scott.
Like every plane, dedication to what ever you decided to do is the key - take off, turn or land ... any hesitation or split decision on a 104 could leave you in a nasty predicament ...
Scott.
#10
Thread Starter
RE: F-104 as first turbine jet? : )
ORIGINAL: siddus74
I have an Avonds 104 and its by far my fav model ... likes straight lines though, you really need to yank the turns but its great - cant speak for other 104s - but as first turbine? Depends on you experience and guts I guess but def as 2nd one ... Flying a 104 makes flying an F15 and such like dull ...
Like every plane, dedication to what ever you decided to do is the key - take off, turn or land ... any hesitation or split decision on a 104 could leave you in a nasty predicament ...
Scott.
I have an Avonds 104 and its by far my fav model ... likes straight lines though, you really need to yank the turns but its great - cant speak for other 104s - but as first turbine? Depends on you experience and guts I guess but def as 2nd one ... Flying a 104 makes flying an F15 and such like dull ...
Like every plane, dedication to what ever you decided to do is the key - take off, turn or land ... any hesitation or split decision on a 104 could leave you in a nasty predicament ...
Scott.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Nottingham, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: F-104 as first turbine jet? : )
ORIGINAL: Sessholvlaru
Do you have the scale retracts? I see they are considerably more expensive than the whole F-104 kit lol.
ORIGINAL: siddus74
I have an Avonds 104 and its by far my fav model ... likes straight lines though, you really need to yank the turns but its great - cant speak for other 104s - but as first turbine? Depends on you experience and guts I guess but def as 2nd one ... Flying a 104 makes flying an F15 and such like dull ...
Like every plane, dedication to what ever you decided to do is the key - take off, turn or land ... any hesitation or split decision on a 104 could leave you in a nasty predicament ...
Scott.
I have an Avonds 104 and its by far my fav model ... likes straight lines though, you really need to yank the turns but its great - cant speak for other 104s - but as first turbine? Depends on you experience and guts I guess but def as 2nd one ... Flying a 104 makes flying an F15 and such like dull ...
Like every plane, dedication to what ever you decided to do is the key - take off, turn or land ... any hesitation or split decision on a 104 could leave you in a nasty predicament ...
Scott.
#14
Thread Starter
RE: F-104 as first turbine jet? : )
ORIGINAL: Redline7000
I have a NIB PA F-104 w/ Robart retracts if interested.
I have a NIB PA F-104 w/ Robart retracts if interested.
#18
My Feedback: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: F-104 as first turbine jet? : )
Chris,
Skymaster will soon release their F-104; it's a monster at 11' long and approx. 3' tall!
However, the empennage/tail separates just aft of the trailing edge for transport.
The landing gear is very impressive - check out the video link below.
Here's are some links from the SM web page:
http://www.skymasterjet.com/104.htm
http://www.skymasterjet.com/LGF104.wmv
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRVAf...ature=youtu.be
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Y3BL...ature=youtu.be
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YEpIi...ature=youtu.be
Enjoy!
Joe D.
Skymaster will soon release their F-104; it's a monster at 11' long and approx. 3' tall!
However, the empennage/tail separates just aft of the trailing edge for transport.
The landing gear is very impressive - check out the video link below.
Here's are some links from the SM web page:
http://www.skymasterjet.com/104.htm
http://www.skymasterjet.com/LGF104.wmv
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRVAf...ature=youtu.be
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Y3BL...ature=youtu.be
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YEpIi...ature=youtu.be
Enjoy!
Joe D.
#19
My Feedback: (11)
RE: F-104 as first turbine jet? : )
Sess, was hoping to have my first turbine flight last weekend but the 30 mph crosswindswere too much for me to risk it. I am not sure what you've flown, nor do I want to deter you in any way, but simply want to add my experience. Looking at your models you posted, one is a foamy which provides you barely anything in terms of flying a turbine powered jet or even a fiberglass EDF for that matter. The other one while fast, probably does add value for sure in terms of speed, and orientation, and maybe eve landing though it does not have a gear. I am certian that is not all you have flown but a good heavy fiberglass EDF will get you very close to the flying part.
I first chose a fly eagle f-16 and was admonished for for it, so I bought the Modellbaue f-86D. I can tell you from a risk perspective, while the f-86D will be easier to fly, the chance of something going wrong is much higher due to the amount of modding and work that had to be done. The FEJ f-16 is by far easier to assemble.
I did have my first taxi test the other day, I was shocked to learn in that wind it is not controllable on the ground and it will weather vein into the wind. All my EDF (fiberglass, 10S setups, 10-15 lbs) and even my smaller HET models will shrug that wind off and even fly. On Idle, the jet will get moving about 10 mph and no way to stop it except brakes. I got a bit flustered with it not stearing and rolling away from me somehow I hit the retract switched and it laid down on the ground like a good dog.
Right now I am kicking myself for not getting a boomerang or shockjet only because I would of been flying already and no where near the risk I am taking. But I know after my first flight I will be so glad I didnt buy that stuff. Assuming of course, it is successful.
So I am not saying to get the 104 or not, but I can tell you it is a new experience. I cannot comment yet on the flight yet and from what I am being told many EDF are harder to fly. Regardless of flying, there is a lot more going on on the ground.
I have an HET l-39 that weighs 11 lbs, that puts the wing loading higher than many turbine powered. But my f-86D weighs 21.5 lbs wet so I am not sure what to expect, but it does seem light on its toes in that wind...
If I get my flight in soon I'll comment again but my instincts tell me this is going to be cake to fly, assuming I did the ground work correctly, and that is the key in all this. If you have flown and built some high powered, heavy EDF I think you are good. If I dont fly for a couple weeks (possible), do you want me to PM you how it goes and give you my final opinion if it is ok to jump into a scale jet?
I first chose a fly eagle f-16 and was admonished for for it, so I bought the Modellbaue f-86D. I can tell you from a risk perspective, while the f-86D will be easier to fly, the chance of something going wrong is much higher due to the amount of modding and work that had to be done. The FEJ f-16 is by far easier to assemble.
I did have my first taxi test the other day, I was shocked to learn in that wind it is not controllable on the ground and it will weather vein into the wind. All my EDF (fiberglass, 10S setups, 10-15 lbs) and even my smaller HET models will shrug that wind off and even fly. On Idle, the jet will get moving about 10 mph and no way to stop it except brakes. I got a bit flustered with it not stearing and rolling away from me somehow I hit the retract switched and it laid down on the ground like a good dog.
Right now I am kicking myself for not getting a boomerang or shockjet only because I would of been flying already and no where near the risk I am taking. But I know after my first flight I will be so glad I didnt buy that stuff. Assuming of course, it is successful.
So I am not saying to get the 104 or not, but I can tell you it is a new experience. I cannot comment yet on the flight yet and from what I am being told many EDF are harder to fly. Regardless of flying, there is a lot more going on on the ground.
I have an HET l-39 that weighs 11 lbs, that puts the wing loading higher than many turbine powered. But my f-86D weighs 21.5 lbs wet so I am not sure what to expect, but it does seem light on its toes in that wind...
If I get my flight in soon I'll comment again but my instincts tell me this is going to be cake to fly, assuming I did the ground work correctly, and that is the key in all this. If you have flown and built some high powered, heavy EDF I think you are good. If I dont fly for a couple weeks (possible), do you want me to PM you how it goes and give you my final opinion if it is ok to jump into a scale jet?
#20
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Oxford, MS
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: F-104 as first turbine jet? : )
ORIGINAL: tp777fo
PA F104 was my first turbine...flew it for years before I sold it.
PA F104 was my first turbine...flew it for years before I sold it.
OP no matter your experience level get some help with your turbine ops, while most wouldn't start with a 104 it's certainly doable, just doubtful that your enjoyment level will be as high with the additional stress level of a more difficult to fly scale plane as a "turbine trainer"