Elevator/Rudder or Elevator/Aileron controls?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Elevator/Rudder or Elevator/Aileron controls?
I'm converting my old Line Controlled planes to R/C, and I was planning on simply building a larger rudder with a hinged control surface, in addition to the elevators that are already there. However, someone mentioned on the Control Line board that all the planes he converted had aileron and elevator control with a fixed rudder. He didn't elaborate as to why, though.
So basically, I'm curious if I can get away with just building a new rudder. I have no doubt the plane will fly, but how it will fly is another story entirely.
Also, it seems that these line controlled planes are a little nose-heavy. Should I alter the COG at all? How far back from the leading edge of the wing should the balance point be?
Thanks.
Charles.
So basically, I'm curious if I can get away with just building a new rudder. I have no doubt the plane will fly, but how it will fly is another story entirely.
Also, it seems that these line controlled planes are a little nose-heavy. Should I alter the COG at all? How far back from the leading edge of the wing should the balance point be?
Thanks.
Charles.
#2
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: gone,
Posts: 4,923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Elevator/Rudder or Elevator/Aileron controls?
Rudder control is relatively ineffective if the aircraft has no dihedral. The typical control line aircraft has no dihedral. You'll be VERY dissapointed with turning capability if you don't have ailerons.
The only way you can get away with rudder, and no ailerons is to cut the wing an give it appx 7 deg dihedral. (typical mid-wing CL aircraft. High wing needs less, low wing needs more)
*********
For CG... you will need to balance it at appx 25% MAC (for straight chord wing, that's 1/4 of the distance from LE to TE) After initial flight testing, you may find the CG can be moved back as far as 32% MAC. (just a bit behind the spar of a typical CL model)
The only way you can get away with rudder, and no ailerons is to cut the wing an give it appx 7 deg dihedral. (typical mid-wing CL aircraft. High wing needs less, low wing needs more)
*********
For CG... you will need to balance it at appx 25% MAC (for straight chord wing, that's 1/4 of the distance from LE to TE) After initial flight testing, you may find the CG can be moved back as far as 32% MAC. (just a bit behind the spar of a typical CL model)
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Elevator/Rudder or Elevator/Aileron controls?
Well, both of these planes are stunt planes, so I guess I'm looking at ailerons. I'm glad I didn't try it before I knew, otherwise I'd likely have plane pieces by now. Thanks!
Charles.
Charles.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Riverside,
RI
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Elevator/Rudder or Elevator/Aileron controls?
As far as balance point is concerned, I'd start with just forward of the main spar. It's better to err forward rather than aft.