Community
Search
Notices
Giant Scale Aircraft - 3D & Aerobatic Discuss all your 3D & Aerobatic giant scale airplanes right here!

hangar 9 cap 232

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-01-2002, 05:59 PM
  #1  
ex747cap
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (9)
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fredericksburg , Va VA
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default hangar 9 cap 232

What is the best Gas engine for the .25 scale hgr. 9 cap 232??? Would like to have good vertical performance, hover etc. Have considered 3w 24 zdz rcs first place ??
Old 09-01-2002, 07:08 PM
  #2  
edge_fanatic
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default try...

Try an FPE 2.7 (nose heavy though, and prob have to build with elevator servos in the rear....)

I have a BME 44 in my H9 edge 540, and I love it. That being said, the plane is quite heavy, but seems to do just fine...

As a rule, light wing loading is better, so you might consider a powerful glow motor, such as a Moki 2.1 (I didn't want a glow motor, which is why I have the BME...)

Cheers!
Old 09-02-2002, 12:53 AM
  #3  
ex747cap
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (9)
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fredericksburg , Va VA
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default hangar 9 cap 232

Thanks for the info. Thought about a saito 180 but burns too much fuel.
Old 09-03-2002, 12:44 AM
  #4  
rockmon
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Land O Lakes, WI
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default hangar 9 cap 232

I have two H9 caps, one has a Moki 1.80 in it and an O.S. 1.60 in the other and both of these glow engines will pull the cap out of sight at 3/4 throttle. The Moki burns a bit of fuel but the power and reliability makes it worth any amount of fuel that it burns. The O.S. doesn't have quite as much power (to me) but is still more power than you need for the cap and quite a bit better on fuel. Heck you can run the moki on 5% nitro or less so fuel for it is a little cheaper, my os likes at least 10% nitro to run at its best so a gallon of fuel is a bit more. I know gas is cheap but to get a gas engine that will match the power of the moki or the o.s. you are going to have a weight penalty that the h9 cap doesn't need because it's heavy to begin with. Just a little something to think about good luck. Bob
Old 09-03-2002, 01:19 AM
  #5  
Scott H.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tracy, CA
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default All up weight of Cap w/1.60?

Bob,

What is the all up weight (less fuel) on your Cap with the OS 160?

I just picked up a WM Cap and am planning on putting the OS 160 out of my Giles into it.

Thanks,

Scott H.
Old 09-03-2002, 11:56 AM
  #6  
lynngordon
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default hangar 9 cap 232

There's another thread with this same question in the gasoline engines forum. Any of the current crop of 2.4 gasoline engines will be great with this plane (Fox, Brison, FPE, ZDZ, etc).

edge_fanatic - was not aware that Kurt (FPE) was offering a 2.7 - just looked at his website, couldn't find anything. Can you give us some more info - maybe same weight but more power?

Lynn
Old 09-03-2002, 11:58 AM
  #7  
ex747cap
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (9)
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fredericksburg , Va VA
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default cap 232

Thanks , good info. What is the flight time with the Moki 1.80 and tank that comes with the cap 232. With this I can figure cost per flight and no. of flts. per gal. What prop are you using to do the torque rolls?
Old 09-03-2002, 11:43 PM
  #8  
Shortman
My Feedback: (21)
 
Shortman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 5,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default hangar 9 cap 232

the os 1.60 with jett in cowl muffler would be very very nice, have the power of the moki 1.8 and weight 13 ounces less
Old 09-04-2002, 12:24 AM
  #9  
radfly
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Florence, SC
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default My H9 with OS 1.60

Just had it's maiden flight today.

Weight with the OS 1.60 is 12 lbs 14 oz using a Zinger 18X6-10 prop and Truturn standard 3" spinner.

Fuel consumption on the 1.60 is tremendous, burning 18 oz of 10% Omega in just under 7 minutes full throttle.

I once had a Saito 180 4-stroke, and remember thinking 2 oz./min was bad.

I will be trading my OS in for another Saito, I do believe.

The OS 1.60 seems to produce adaquate power for this model, at this weight. But, I did not try any extreme or 3D maneuvers today.

Do not let them fool you, 4-strokes burn less gas for the thrust.

Well, except for my YS 1.40 L which burns 2.2 oz./min. But, heck it is worth it, since it almost matches the Saito 180 in power, but has that real handy pump feature.

In a two stroke, I do not run more than 10% Caster mix. In a 4 stroke, I run 25% or 30% synthetic Coolpower. My two strokes tell me they hate synthetic 25%, cause they lean out as they heat up.
Old 09-04-2002, 08:12 AM
  #10  
radfly
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Florence, SC
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Wait a minute

My memory is slowly comming back.

My Saito 180 was running a 16 x 8, and my OS 160 is running an 18 x 6-10, at a higher RPM than the Saito combo.

I guess that means I am getting lots more thrust than I thought. Duh. Is it worth the increase in fuel consumption? I can only answer that when I try some 3D stuff with the CAP.

Sorry for the confusion.
Old 09-26-2002, 01:49 AM
  #11  
NavyFlyer
Member
My Feedback: (8)
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Florence, AL,
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default hangar 9 cap 232

Man, i hate picking an engine.. I had a 2.4 for my cap.. needed money.. sold it.. now i'm back to os 1.60 or moki 1.8... I think we'll go with the moki.
Old 09-26-2002, 04:09 AM
  #12  
Shortman
My Feedback: (21)
 
Shortman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 5,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default hangar 9 cap 232

its a pain isnt it, took me a good month of debate of what engine to get
Old 09-26-2002, 04:46 PM
  #13  
funfly33
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Alexandria, IN
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default hangar 9 cap 232

Moki 1.80 burns about 2oz a min.
Old 09-28-2002, 02:51 PM
  #14  
robert
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: private, FRANCE
Posts: 2,504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default hangar 9 cap 232

YS 140DZ=2oz a minute....and about the same if not more power than a Saito. Its the Same as the 140RX for RPMs. I run a 16x11 on the 140L and it finds it a lightish load.
Just to show you the other engines available.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.