Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Boats > Speed - RC Gas Boats
Reload this Page >

Rudder length equal to prop diameter eliminates hull torque

Community
Search
Notices
Speed - RC Gas Boats Discuss gas RC boats right here!

Rudder length equal to prop diameter eliminates hull torque

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-2007, 02:56 PM
  #51  
patriktegelberg
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Uppsala/Ö˛egrund, SWEDEN
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Rudder length equal to prop diameter eliminates hull torque

Width is not a parameter in the solution as presented no. Frudder acts on force center, solution is presented in terms of forces and distances to force centers.
Old 04-26-2007, 03:01 PM
  #52  
johnnyx
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portsmouth, NL, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Rudder length equal to prop diameter eliminates hull torque

this is all a bit over my head to be honest but surely the force would differ with ruder width
Old 04-26-2007, 03:11 PM
  #53  
patriktegelberg
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Uppsala/Ö˛egrund, SWEDEN
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Rudder length equal to prop diameter eliminates hull torque

Max possible force would vary, surely. However to go straight the force on the rudder is the same as the prop force. So a wider rudder could run straight with less deflection. The equlibrium force do not depend on the width.
Old 04-26-2007, 03:32 PM
  #54  
DaveMarles
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sunny Cheshire UK, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Rudder length equal to prop diameter eliminates hull torque

Patrik, I think you miss my original point. The idea is to run straight with zero rudder deflection.
Old 04-26-2007, 03:39 PM
  #55  
johnnyx
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portsmouth, NL, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Rudder length equal to prop diameter eliminates hull torque

thats got that one sorted out
Old 04-26-2007, 03:42 PM
  #56  
martno1fan
Senior Member
 
martno1fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: blackpool, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 11,390
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Rudder length equal to prop diameter eliminates hull torque


ORIGINAL: DaveMarles

Martin you are a bit thin skinned for a Yorkshire lad, been in Blackpool too long?
that could be true Dave but you try been on the end of some of the s*** ive had to put up with and dont even try to say i ask for it.right let me try this one as regards prop walk surely the best place to counter the prop walk is to put the rudder on the left to counter the prop walk of the prop?.prop tries to send the transome left thus making the boat turn right so put rudder on left this creates drag to the left counteracting the prop walk?.this way you will not need any left ruder to counteract the prop walk?.
Old 04-26-2007, 03:49 PM
  #57  
Believe It
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Blue Ridge, GA
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Rudder length equal to prop diameter eliminates hull torque

ORIGINAL: patriktegelberg

I am saying prop torque causing the hull to roll can be countered with the right length rudder, if a surface piercing prop is used.

... are you saying the only way it will not suffer from torque roll is to have the area of the rudder thats actually in the water same diameter (+ a little) of the prop being run, if on a surface drive application?


My prop is around 2-5/8" diameter (just checking with straight edge ...its a ABC MW3) and i have 4" of rudder from the CL of the shaft to the bottom of the rudder. My boat suffers from no torque roll as long as the rudder is not kicked back. So im tryin to figure out what ya tryin to get at here... you sayin its too long or too short [&:]
Old 04-26-2007, 03:53 PM
  #58  
Believe It
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Blue Ridge, GA
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Rudder length equal to prop diameter eliminates hull torque


ORIGINAL: martno1fan


ORIGINAL: DaveMarles

Martin you are a bit thin skinned for a Yorkshire lad, been in Blackpool too long?
that could be true Dave but you try been on the end of some of the s*** ive had to put up with and dont even try to say i ask for it.right let me try this one as regards prop walk surely the best place to counter the prop walk is to put the rudder on the left to counter the prop walk of the prop?.prop tries to send the transome left thus making the boat turn right so put rudder on left this creates drag to the left counteracting the prop walk?.this way you will not need any left ruder to counteract the prop walk?.
Negative.... but maybe it all comes down to the setup. My hydro (which has the rudder on left) suffers from propwalk quite a bit with one of my props. The best way to counteract propwalk is to make sure that prop is as sharp if not sharper then the best knife if your house.
Old 04-26-2007, 03:55 PM
  #59  
alan007bandit
Senior Member
 
alan007bandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: DARWEN,,LANCASHIRE, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Rudder length equal to prop diameter eliminates hull torque

HI MART GLAD YOUR BACK I GAVE A GOOD FIGHT ON YOUR BEHALF, AND NEVER GOT KICKED OF I AM SUPRISED,PAT GREAT THEORY I WILL GIVE IT A GO AS I AM TROUBLED WITH THIS AND MY PROP YOU COULD SLICE A GNATS WING WITH IT THANKS TO OUR MATE PETE, WITH THE CUT FINGER..................ALAN
ORIGINAL: martno1fan

now you know how it feels pat,while i too am not experienced in setting up gas boats or building hardware or electrics im not a fool and i am a time served boat builder and have built boats from small tenders in wood to larger wooden craft and have fitted out large luxury yachts upto 120 ft long so when it comes to building i know which end of a boat is which.yet ive been treated like a fool on this forum by far too many so called experts.do not desert us mate i for one like your humour and you querky ways.your one of the good guys on here and but for people like you i would have deserted the site yesterday and almost did but by popular demand IM BACK hehe!!.
Old 04-26-2007, 04:00 PM
  #60  
patriktegelberg
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Uppsala/Ö˛egrund, SWEDEN
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Rudder length equal to prop diameter eliminates hull torque

My idea was to eliminate prop torque by using the rudder. I realize there are other parameters to take into acount when choosing rudder length. The torque parameter is described here. Running without deflection is another problem that I did not bring in here. Do not ask for this to solve problems I have not claimed to solve.

So far the real calculation results presented in #1 post have not even come into scope. I figured it fairly obvious that this is how it works, that there is an equlibrium length. The result I presented was an approx of what the length actually is. I left out all calculations and presented the result for a simple case and some parameters that affect the length. I did not expect to get much interest, not to be told that I am wrong either.

Appologies all around to all I have disapointed.
Old 04-26-2007, 04:21 PM
  #61  
DaveMarles
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sunny Cheshire UK, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Rudder length equal to prop diameter eliminates hull torque

Patrik I reread the posts and see that I did not read your replies correctly. You did say early on that you were not advocating a solution involving zero rudder deflection. Sorry about that.
For me applying rudder to counteract torque is not an option.

Mart, I think the rudder on the left could be a problem in the right hand turns because less rudder would be submerged. I could be wrong and it might work but I don't think I would test it myself.
Old 04-26-2007, 04:22 PM
  #62  
martno1fan
Senior Member
 
martno1fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: blackpool, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 11,390
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Rudder length equal to prop diameter eliminates hull torque


ORIGINAL: Believe It


ORIGINAL: martno1fan


ORIGINAL: DaveMarles

Martin you are a bit thin skinned for a Yorkshire lad, been in Blackpool too long?
that could be true Dave but you try been on the end of some of the s*** ive had to put up with and dont even try to say i ask for it.right let me try this one as regards prop walk surely the best place to counter the prop walk is to put the rudder on the left to counter the prop walk of the prop?.prop tries to send the transome left thus making the boat turn right so put rudder on left this creates drag to the left counteracting the prop walk?.this way you will not need any left ruder to counteract the prop walk?.
Negative.... but maybe it all comes down to the setup. My hydro (which has the rudder on left) suffers from propwalk quite a bit with one of my props. The best way to counteract propwalk is to make sure that prop is as sharp if not sharper then the best knife if your house.
hi the reason i say this is because my mate rick had been doing tests in a test tank at college with a guy who races full size boats and he found that gave the best results to overcome prop walk along with an extended strut .by that i mean that rather than the prop been close to the trailing edge of the strut it is set back quite a bit this means the prop is in clear water rather than in turbulent water caused by the strut.with the extended strut the prop is in clear water thus eliminating the prop walk or so he found in the tests.i had a pic of it but i cant post it for some reason ill see if i can change it to jpeg and post it if i can.he also found the rudder on the left helped too.
Old 04-26-2007, 04:29 PM
  #63  
martno1fan
Senior Member
 
martno1fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: blackpool, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 11,390
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Rudder length equal to prop diameter eliminates hull torque

hi dave i was considering testing it out myself but i didnt fancy removing my rudder and altering things too much just yet.apparently it still turns ok right dont ask me how they worked it out and i wish hed come in and explain it better .but he convinced rick enough for him to say his boat will have a rudder on the left.i understand that in races where you turn right it may be less effective but im not sure but for an experiment it might be worth a try if anyones willing or has a boat thats not finnished yet .i just wish i could post this pic of the strut i just mentioned .this is the best i could do i took a pic off the monitor hope you can see what i was talking about?.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Nl29041.jpg
Views:	127
Size:	36.2 KB
ID:	672817  
Old 04-26-2007, 04:34 PM
  #64  
patriktegelberg
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Uppsala/Ö˛egrund, SWEDEN
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Rudder length equal to prop diameter eliminates hull torque

OK.
This was the original calculations. Can we now go back to me beeing right but uninteresting and weird?
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Rp44519.jpg
Views:	106
Size:	25.4 KB
ID:	672820  
Old 04-26-2007, 04:43 PM
  #65  
martno1fan
Senior Member
 
martno1fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: blackpool, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 11,390
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Rudder length equal to prop diameter eliminates hull torque


ORIGINAL: patriktegelberg

OK.
This was the original calculations. Can we now go back to me beeing right but uninteresting and weird?
pat your not wierd your just misunderstood
Old 04-26-2007, 04:50 PM
  #66  
edmkills
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: edmonton, AB, CANADA
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Rudder length equal to prop diameter eliminates hull torque

Here you go!

December 1997 Roostertail
Mono Mania by John Finch:

As Mono Director, it is my job to foster the growth of the class. To accomplish this goal, I will be clarifying design criteria and even letting out some of the secrets that put the top drivers in the winner's circle. I can't do it all in one article, so stay tuned throughout the year in this section of the newsletter.

As you know, if you have been reading your newsletters, the Rule Book section on Mono hull classifications has been cleaned up a bit in an attempt to better define a Mono hull. By definition, a Mono hull is a boat that has a continuous wetted surface while operating at racing speed. This means that it cannot have steps, sponsons, or any other appendage that keeps the model from having one continuous wetted surface. This includes the bottom profile when the boat banks to negotiate a turn. I know that the real boats have steps and wings, but IMPBA does not recognize these as legal features in the Mono class. There are modelers that feel threatened by these advancements, so these changes have yet to take place in IMPBA.

To be successful in the Mono class it helps to have an understanding of Mono hull design in it's purest state. By that I mean the understanding of weight, balance, aerodynamic and hydrodynamic drag, lifting area, planing area, and power to weight ratios. You see, a pure Mono is far more difficult to tune for all out potential than a three point Hydro. The key word is potential! When it comes to a beginner or intermediate level model the Mono is by far the easier to handle and trim than the Hydro. But again, that is because we have accepted the Mono as a heavy sluggish vehicle with no hope of going extremely fast.

On the other hand, as a modeler who has two Mono hulls that consistently run over 70 MPH, I know that we can do better. The problem with a 70 MPH Mono is that it wont finish a single heat in a race with five other models cranking up the wakes. So, it is a compromice of stability and speed that we must make as we put together a Mono hull that goes fast but still finishes races.

In todays heat racing scene, a 50 MPH Mono is capable of winning races in all four engine classes. The fact is that most Mono hulls clocked at big events are only running 45 to 48 MPH. They look like they are going faster, but that is only because they are not trimmed properly. The boats that look slower, because they are trimmed properly, are the ones that are going faster and winning the races. So, the first subject to be covered in this series will be that of running hardware on the boat and how it affects the trimming of the model.

HARDWARE SETUP

Deep Vee models are the best type of Mono for heat racing. They handle traffic and rough water conditions very well. Vee angles ranging from 19 degrees to 23 degrees seem to work best for heat racing. Shallow vee boats are faster on calm water and deeper vbee boats work best in rough water.

If a model is designed well, it will work with almost any hardware setup. If a model is lacking in some areas, you can sometimes help the handling of the model by changing the hardware setup. Today I will cover trim tabs.

TRIM TABS

Trim tabs are those plates at the transom that are used to adjust the ride angle of the model. Usually, they are mounted on the transom about an inch up from the keel to as far out as to the chine line of the model. The chine line is the corner where the bottom of the hull meets the side of the hull. The chine line extends from the transom (back of boat) to the bow (front of boat). The tabs are usually split into two adjustable plates on each side of the hull which makes two separate adjustable tabs on each side of the model.

INSIDE TABS

The innermost tabs are adjusted up and down to direct the bow of the boat either up or down. Adjusting the tabs downward will push the bow of the boat down as water leaving the trailing edge of the tabs causes lift at the transom, thus pushing down the bow. Raising the trailing edge of the tabs will reduce the lift at the transom and allow the bow to run lighter on the water. If the boat leans to the right because of engine torque, which it most probably will, the right or starboard tab is adjusted downward at the inside trailing edge, (edge closest to the prop), to shoot water downward off the right hand tab, which in turn will lifts the right side of the model. Keep in mind that lowering the right tab will not only lift the right side of the model, but also cause the bow to be pushed down as well. If the boat is leaning to the right and also running very wet, it would be better to raise the left inside tab (tab closest to the prop on the left side of the boat).

So, you are adjusting two things when you adjust the inside tabs: the hull attitude bow to stern and the ride left to right. Most hulls that are set up properly for heat racing are adjusted with the left tab slightly down and the right tab about 1/16 of an inch deeper than the left tab.

OUTSIDE TABS

The outer tabs, close to the chine line, are used primarily for adjusting the ride thru the comers. The right outermost tab adjusts the ride for right hand turns and the left outermost tab adjusts left hand turns. If they are flat with the hull, the boat will turn a predetermined radius. If they are pushed downward, the model will turn a tighter corner 'because the water shooting off the tab lifts that corner of the hull at the transom, which in turn causes the keel at the bow to be forced into the water with more authority. You see, a Mono slides as it turns, and if the bow digs in, the boat turns sharper.

If you raise the outside tab, the boat will become less sensitive in the corners as the bow rides lighter on the water and slides through the turn.

Most models I have worked with are too sensitive in the corners, so the outside tabs have to be raised considerably to get good linear turns out of the model. Some boats work better without an outside tab, and some models, like the Seaducer, don't use tabs at all. The Seaducer type hull does not bank hard to negotiate a turn, so the tab scenario described does not apply to it or any other Mono that stands up in the corners. Now you have the knowledge it takes to trim tabs to your advantage. There are other things that can be done to trim your Mono too, so stay tuned for the next issue of MONO MANIA.

Because there's no such thing as a boat that's TOO fast!

March 1998 Roostertail
MONO MANIA
BY JOHN FINCH

We talked about trim tabs in the last issue of the newsletter and how they affected the ride of a monohull. In this issue of MONO MANIA, I will elaborate on the strut and how it affects the ride of the boat. We already learned that we could compensate for torque roll by bending the right inside trim tab downward to shoot water off the bottom of the right side of the model. The downward stream of high speed water lifts the right side of the boat and fights the natural need for the model to roll to the right as viewed from the transom. Torque roll can also be adjusted out of a model by positioning the strut off center or by raising the strut.

TORQUEROLL

Monohulls tend to roll over to their right in a clockwise direction as viewed from the rear of the model. This is because the prop grabs water in a counter clockwise direction and the resulting action is that the engine, which is attached to the hull, is forced to rotate clockwise as the prop encounters the resistive force of the water.

To help fight torque, you can position the strut to the right of the keel. With the strut just a bit to the right of the keel, one eighth of an inch or so for example, the lifting action of the prop is distributed more to the right side of the model. The added lifting force on the right side of the model helps to deter the engines rotational force and reduces the amount of down trim tab adjustment that is needed on the fight inside tab for keeping the boat from leaning on it's side. That was a secret, so don't tell anyone!
SHAFT ANGLE

The angle of the strut up and down will determine if the bow rides light or wet. Negative angle, which angles the prop thrust cone downward, will cause the transom to be lifted and the bow to be forced downward. Kicking the strut back, so that prop blast is pointed up will cause the bow to ride light on the water. I recommend that the strut angle always be perfectly parallel with the keel or within two degrees of parallel. The reason is this: When the boat leaves the water during a race, the tabs will have no affect on keeping the boat from blowing off the water. If the angle of the strut is positive, the prop may push the boat into blowing off the water. If strut angle is negative, the bow will be pushed into the water and the boat may submarine. If the strut is parallel with the keel, the prop will push the boat straight and level until it settles back into the water. Of course this is assuming that the model is balanced aerodynamically with the proper center of gravity.

Another variable is strut depth. The deeper the strut is in the water, the more the boat is lifted out of the water. As the strut is made more shallow, the boat is allowed to settle into the water. Surface drive struts are popular because they allow the model to settle into the water. This helps to get the trim tabs into the water to stop chine walk.

Now you know how to fight the chine walk problem. We will talk about prop walk in the next issue, so stay tuned and read the Roostertail from front to back. An informed model boater is a better model boater.
June 1998 Roostertail
MONO MANIA
BY JOHN FINCH


We talked about trim tabs in the first issue of the newsletter and then struts in the second issue. Now lets get into prop walk and add all three issues together for a smooth running Mono.

Prop Walk

Prop walk is the action that causes the model to veer to the right when at full speed. This is caused by the propeller dragging the transom to the left. The transom is dragged to the left because the prop, rotating in counter clockwise direction, tends to walk like a paddle wheel in that direction.

As a visual aid to understanding propwalk, visualize the propeller spinning counter clockwise as viewed from the rear of the boat. Draw a line from the left to right through the middle of the prop. The line divides the propeller into two halves; an upper half and a lower half. Blade movement on the upper half goes right to left. Prop blades on the lower half travel left to right. On a surface drive model the lower half of propeller rotation has a strong bite in solid water. The upper half, however, is partially above the water and has less bite in the water, so the prop paddle wheels to the left. With a subsurface setup, the strut blade can cause a stream of air bubbles to interfere with good prop bite in the upper half of rotation, which allows propwalk to run wild.

Compensating for Prop Walk

One way to compensate for prop walk is to bend the strut to the left, much like an outboard engine that is turned to the left to make the boat turn left. This method can cause other problems, though, so pay attention to detail. If your strut exits the boat dead center out of the transom, twisting the strut to the left will put the prop left of the centerline of the boat. The prop being to the left of the center of the boat may cause the boat to chine walks badly after the adjustment. Reason being, the prop lifts the left side of the boat more than the right side. With torque lifting the left side of the boat along with the prop being off center, the left side of the boat is lifted easily and can cause the boat to rock violently.

A Better Solution

The biggest cause of propwalk in a Mono is the strut blade. When water hits the strut blade, it is separated and runs on both sides of the strut blade. The problem is that it doesn't immediately blend back together after it passes the trailing edge of the strut blade. A trail of broken water leaves the strut blade but does not become a solid water mass for some distance. As I said earlier, the upper half of the prop rotation is located directly behind the strut blade and rides in the disturbed water flow.

The solution is to extend the strut hub far enough behind the strut blade so that water has time to join back together before entering the prop blades. I find that an inch is usually enough. This works with surface drive models too, because the new prop location far behind the transom of the boat puts the prop deeper into clean water. While the extended prop shaft length does allow more water to hit the top half of prop rotation, and the prop becomes more submerged, propwalk is reduced and increased speed is the result.

An advantage is also seen in the extended prop shaft as the prop, when further from the transom, tends to keep the bow positioned without the need for radical trim tab adjustment. As the bow rises, the prop gets deeper in the water and pushes the bow back down into the water. That is top secret info!!!!! If you get the distance just right, it takes less trim tab to keep a fast boat on the water. I have found that three to four inches work best for me, depending on the model. If you get the prop too far behind the transom you will know it, because the boat will hop, especially in the corners.

In an earlier issue I said that I prefer a strut angle that is parallel to the keel, and that is a good benchmark for most boats, If however, you have a surface drive model that is really hauling the freight, some negative angle and a long strut hub will give you the control you need to drive in the 55 MPH range with full control.

A combination of slight strut twist and an elongated strut hub used together will sometimes give the best mix in compensation for prop walk. If you plan on twisting the strut, build the stuffing tube so that it exits just to the right of the centerline at the transom, so that when you bend the strut to the left, the prop ends up dead center on the centerline of the boat. Good luck in taming that wild beast we call a Mono
Old 04-26-2007, 05:02 PM
  #67  
martno1fan
Senior Member
 
martno1fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: blackpool, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 11,390
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Rudder length equal to prop diameter eliminates hull torque

cheers ed i read all that to find the bit i was on about regarding the extended strut right in the last few paragraphs !!i think ill need to find a copy of that book too.
Old 04-26-2007, 05:08 PM
  #68  
edmkills
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: edmonton, AB, CANADA
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Rudder length equal to prop diameter eliminates hull torque

Your welcome Mart I have a ton of stuff that I haven't had the time to go through yet. When I saw the post about the article it rang a bell and low and behold I had a copy .
Old 04-26-2007, 05:14 PM
  #69  
glennb2006
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Newcastle, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Rudder length equal to prop diameter eliminates hull torque

Thanks edmkills. Just saved me some typing.

Glenn
Old 04-26-2007, 05:17 PM
  #70  
martno1fan
Senior Member
 
martno1fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: blackpool, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 11,390
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Rudder length equal to prop diameter eliminates hull torque

any chance you can email it to me mate?
[email protected]
Old 04-26-2007, 05:21 PM
  #71  
edmkills
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: edmonton, AB, CANADA
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Rudder length equal to prop diameter eliminates hull torque

I don't have the whole book just those articles, is that what your after?
Old 04-26-2007, 05:22 PM
  #72  
w3bby
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Helsingborg, SWEDEN
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Rudder length equal to prop diameter eliminates hull torque


ORIGINAL: martno1fan
i took a pic off the monitor hope you can see what i was talking about?.
Interesting, but our boats are using surface drive so what is happening at top of the prop is not relevant. When at speed, it is in the air.
[link=http://www.well.com/user/pk/SPAprofboat.html]Surface drive[/link]
Old 04-26-2007, 05:27 PM
  #73  
glennb2006
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Newcastle, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Rudder length equal to prop diameter eliminates hull torque


ORIGINAL: w3bby



Interesting, but our boats are using surface drive so what is happening at top of the prop is not relevant. When at speed, it is in the air.
[link=http://www.well.com/user/pk/SPAprofboat.html]Surface drive[/link]
Hi Ian,
depends which way your boat is at the time. Martin can have an input here now.

[8D]

Glenn
Old 04-26-2007, 06:06 PM
  #74  
martno1fan
Senior Member
 
martno1fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: blackpool, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 11,390
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Rudder length equal to prop diameter eliminates hull torque

ian those are surface struts and the tests werd done using them and the extended one made a diff in the water tunnel ,hopefully rick will testify to it as he was there .and if its good enough for john finch its good enough for me i think the pics could be better as like you say its showing the turbulance above the prop in the diagram but all the tests were done using surface struts.also read the article posted by ed and look at better solutions to overcome prop walk same applies to surface drives as the prop gets submerged more because its further back apparently,thus overcoming prop walk and faster speed results .
Old 04-26-2007, 07:16 PM
  #75  
MrMikeG
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mildura, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 2,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Rudder length equal to prop diameter eliminates hull torque

To all I apologise for sounding condescending, must times when I type I'm smiling and you can't see that on these forums.
Dave, I'm a Yank in Aussieland, thick skinned and hard headed. (BTW first boat was a multi!)
John Finch has 3 books all were available in the back of the US boat modeller magazine.
Ron Frank is just a model boater, hasn't been on-line in a while now, very very fast guy always willing to help.
Brian Callahan did his PHD thesis on the effects of a wedge rudder on a model boat, it used to be on-line somewhere and I have it in print (again somewhere). He is one of the mods over on RC boat, not sure if the site is still up or not though. Mostly runs riggers but surface drive is still the same.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.