Real Deal!! Turbine powered R/C car!!
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Springfield, MS,
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Real Deal!! Turbine powered R/C car!!
Here'e a photo of a turbine (jet) powered 1/8 scale R/C car. It is actually jet propelled as there isn't a drive connection with the wheels. It uses kerosene as fuel.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Springfield, MS,
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Real Deal!! Turbine powered R/C car!!
Sorry, don't have a video. The turbine engine is originally used on model R/C jets. There are several manufactures that produce them (OS isn't one of them at least not yet). The model jets with these engines are capable of flying up to 200 MPH (no misprint!).
They require an extensive starting method that includes compressed air and propane. Once the engine is "warmed-up" it's transferred over to the kerosene. I feel this "jet" car is just a design exercise as turbines do not throttle very well and as the turbine is not connected to the drive wheels, acceleration probably suffers. I've seen model jets take off and they need a long runway to achieve flight speed. I guess if you install an afterburner things would be different (lol).
They require an extensive starting method that includes compressed air and propane. Once the engine is "warmed-up" it's transferred over to the kerosene. I feel this "jet" car is just a design exercise as turbines do not throttle very well and as the turbine is not connected to the drive wheels, acceleration probably suffers. I've seen model jets take off and they need a long runway to achieve flight speed. I guess if you install an afterburner things would be different (lol).
#5
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: indianapolis,
IN
Posts: 4,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Real Deal!! Turbine powered R/C car!!
Hmm, I wonder how much those run, specially those jet RC's that can go 200mph, NOW THAT Would make RC Planes fun, other than that there is no point to fly :-/ Those must run in the 1000's though... How long does fuel run on these things, I wouldnt think very long... specially with how they burn the stuff. How big are the fuel tanks in the jets?
#6
Senior Member
My Feedback: (10)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: greeleyCOLORADO
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Real Deal!! Turbine powered R/C car!!
buddy of mine just bought one like that for his jet,they do take extensive suport gear as krusty said,and he paid 1700 for a kit to build it! i was on my way over to his house when i heard it from a block away and started looking up for the jet,it was very loud! but cool!! puts out 12 pounds of thrust,not sure how thats computed or how to compare it but it sounds powerfull
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hoover, AL
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Real Deal!! Turbine powered R/C car!!
I saw a Hirobo Lama heli with a turbine fly at our latest fly in, and the guy flying it said it would go through a 1/2 gallon of kerosene in 8 minutes!!! Sounds sooooo cool.....
#12
Real Deal!! Turbine powered R/C car!!
Wow.. where did you get that pic? I saw that pic pop up at least 3 years ago, pretty cool, no? yeah, i wonder if it is faster than the rc10l used to set the electric speed record!
coooool!
but just think, that car costs maybe 2-3 k as it is! a crash would set you back far! even a tiny pebble that a tire hits might send that car cartwheeling to hell. pretty cool...
coooool!
but just think, that car costs maybe 2-3 k as it is! a crash would set you back far! even a tiny pebble that a tire hits might send that car cartwheeling to hell. pretty cool...
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Fairfax, VA,
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Real Deal!! Turbine powered R/C car!!
I doubt it accelerates very fast though, since turbines need time to spool up and have very little actual torque because all it does is have to spin the blades...I'm sure if you have enough space it would hit 100mph!
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver,
BC, CANADA
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Real Deal!! Turbine powered R/C car!!
I dont know much about rc cars, but i think that thing would still acellerate pretty damn fast. Lets say it weighs 10 lbs??? thats a guess... it would accelerate at 12 m/s/s. 0-60 mph in about 2.5 s, from a fully spooled start. maybe not as much accleration as a nitro car ( i dunno know) until about 40m/s, but the thrust of a turbine increases dramatically with velocity. It probably has better acceleration in the 40 m/s range than at a standstill even with drag involved
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Springfield, MS,
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Real Deal!! Turbine powered R/C car!!
Originally posted by mullenc525
... it would accelerate at 12 m/s/s. 0-60 mph in about 2.5 s, from a fully spooled start.
... it would accelerate at 12 m/s/s. 0-60 mph in about 2.5 s, from a fully spooled start.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Fairfax, VA,
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Real Deal!! Turbine powered R/C car!!
Its just the fact all its doing it taking in air, combusting it and pushing it out the back at high speed (of course its 1000x more complicated but thats in simple terms) and since air doesn't weigh very much it takes alot to get it moving.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Franklin Park,
NJ
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Real Deal!! Turbine powered R/C car!!
well jet engines work on the same principle that piston engines do.
suck squeeze bang blow
not complicated at all.
suck squeeze bang blow
not complicated at all.
#19
Real Deal!! Turbine powered R/C car!!
the only difference is that reciprocating engines do those steps in determined, quantum steps.
JEts do them all AT THE SAME TIME in relation to time.
You need algebra to work with one and advanced Multvariate Integral Calculus to work with the other!
Add in thermodynamics and the concept of time space coordination and you got one hell of a math model!!
Still jets are COOL AS HELL!! The sound alone is to die for!
ram
JEts do them all AT THE SAME TIME in relation to time.
You need algebra to work with one and advanced Multvariate Integral Calculus to work with the other!
Add in thermodynamics and the concept of time space coordination and you got one hell of a math model!!
Still jets are COOL AS HELL!! The sound alone is to die for!
ram
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Franklin Park,
NJ
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Real Deal!! Turbine powered R/C car!!
I guess you never saw the junkyard wars where they built a jet powered trike out of a old turbo unit and some pipes
maath? wee don need no skeekin' maath
(acually I am suprised the thing didnt blow up....)
maath? wee don need no skeekin' maath
(acually I am suprised the thing didnt blow up....)
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Farmington,
NH
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
minor points:
Just a few points from a RC Jet flyer;
1. My jet doesn't hasve ball bearings in the wheels, I want them, but it didnt start that way, upgrades are spread over time due to cost... So I have much more rolling resistance/drag.
2. We worry more about the brakes than the bearings in the wheels!
3. I have a 10 lb thrust Ducted Fan, Not true Turbine, In a 14 lb plane <fueled>. It accels well enough to take off in about 200 feet running on GRASS. Turbines are more powerful but weigh more...
4. Our jets weigh a lot more than that car. It will accel faster.
5. Our jets have more air drag than the car, It will accell faster yet once moving.
And Yes Turbines are damn expensive to my standards.
A good modern Turbine runs around $3000 US
BUT, These will self start at the flip of a switch on your transmitter! <You need some extra goodies in the plane too>
And they self cool when you shut them off, No more leaf blower in the intake...
BUT, older compressed air/propane start and Leaf blower cooldown engines are now cheaper to buy...
Bottom line, Many $$ buys cool toys !!!
Ramjet
1. My jet doesn't hasve ball bearings in the wheels, I want them, but it didnt start that way, upgrades are spread over time due to cost... So I have much more rolling resistance/drag.
2. We worry more about the brakes than the bearings in the wheels!
3. I have a 10 lb thrust Ducted Fan, Not true Turbine, In a 14 lb plane <fueled>. It accels well enough to take off in about 200 feet running on GRASS. Turbines are more powerful but weigh more...
4. Our jets weigh a lot more than that car. It will accel faster.
5. Our jets have more air drag than the car, It will accell faster yet once moving.
And Yes Turbines are damn expensive to my standards.
A good modern Turbine runs around $3000 US
BUT, These will self start at the flip of a switch on your transmitter! <You need some extra goodies in the plane too>
And they self cool when you shut them off, No more leaf blower in the intake...
BUT, older compressed air/propane start and Leaf blower cooldown engines are now cheaper to buy...
Bottom line, Many $$ buys cool toys !!!
Ramjet
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: santa clarita,
CA,
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Real Deal!! Turbine powered R/C car!!
Originally posted by JohnVH
Id like to see vid of it too.
If you guys have never seen/heard a turbine go, goto my jet website below and check out my jets movie..
Id like to see vid of it too.
If you guys have never seen/heard a turbine go, goto my jet website below and check out my jets movie..
Anyone else get the jet video to work?
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver,
BC, CANADA
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Real Deal!! Turbine powered R/C car!!
i still agree with ramjet about the acceleration. Thrust is usually measured statically with a turbine, so at a fully spooled standstill, divide thrust by weight, multiply by 9.8 and you have A in m/s/s. its newtons law, f=ma, no arguments. Drag? turbine thrust increases dramatically with ram air, so this would more than account for drag. The rolling friction of the car would also be minimal, with no drivetrain. Nitro cars can go 100mph, i think this could go considerably faster.