Giles 202 question
#1
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (16)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: muncie,
IN
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Giles 202 question
Tom..
Should I cover the lightning holes in the front bulkhead of the fuse to keep wind blast out of the interior?
I have already covered the bulkhead bottom, behind the muffler, and made a false firewall.
I will be using a 3W75i. (rear induction).
Many thanx....croz
Should I cover the lightning holes in the front bulkhead of the fuse to keep wind blast out of the interior?
I have already covered the bulkhead bottom, behind the muffler, and made a false firewall.
I will be using a 3W75i. (rear induction).
Many thanx....croz
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Flower Mound (near Dallas),
TX
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: Giles 202 question
Originally posted by 2rolls
Tom..
Should I cover the lightning holes in the front bulkhead of the fuse to keep wind blast out of the interior?
I have already covered the bulkhead bottom, behind the muffler, and made a false firewall.
I will be using a 3W75i. (rear induction).
Many thanx....croz
Tom..
Should I cover the lightning holes in the front bulkhead of the fuse to keep wind blast out of the interior?
I have already covered the bulkhead bottom, behind the muffler, and made a false firewall.
I will be using a 3W75i. (rear induction).
Many thanx....croz
The notion that there will be an air current through the fuse is incorrect. Even with the holes open, the air has nowhere to go in the fuse, so there is no airflow to speak of unless you open up a hole in the covering farther back.
What you do get with the F1 holes is some air pressure inside the fuse. We have never had a report of the covering blowing off the fuse, so it does not appear to be very much pressure.
If using canister mufflers one would need the holes to allow cooling air to reach the mifflers.
So my answer is, do what you prefer. It does not seem to make any difference either way in this case.
TF