Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
Reload this Page >

bvm 58" f86 info needed

Community
Search
Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

bvm 58" f86 info needed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-2013, 08:04 AM
  #1  
robersteam
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: buenos aires, ARGENTINA
Posts: 185
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default bvm 58" f86 info needed

hi friends.i had just bought one 58" f86 nib.
i´d like any input.building thread or detailed pic.
i´m thinking in a k60 for power,what do you think?
any thoughts ´ll be welcome.
thanks in advance
Norberto
Old 12-04-2013, 10:44 PM
  #2  
Boomerang1
 
Boomerang1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sydney, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 2,967
Received 21 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Which version is yours?

They evolved from a DF model, to a turbine model, to an ARF.

Mine is a DF kit version fitted with the turbine conversion kit
& fitted with a P-60. I modified quite a few things on mine.

Although I bought it partly built I found it frustrating sorting out the
problems needed to make it satisfy me. - John.

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Sabre front.jpg
Views:	250
Size:	820.6 KB
ID:	1944877  
Old 12-04-2013, 10:53 PM
  #3  
Doug Cronkhite
My Feedback: (34)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,821
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

It it's 58", then it's the original kit. The AFS was 60 or 63 (with the wingtip extension).
Old 12-05-2013, 02:17 AM
  #4  
robersteam
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: buenos aires, ARGENTINA
Posts: 185
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Doug Cronkhite
It it's 58", then it's the original kit. The AFS was 60 or 63 (with the wingtip extension).
yes Doug it´s a foam core wing 58".from 1994 i think.should i add wingtip extension,fuse is the same?.i´m also thinking about two pieces wing to make it easy transport to international events.what do you think?
Old 12-05-2013, 05:25 AM
  #5  
Chris Smith
My Feedback: (2)
 
Chris Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Adams TN
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

It's considered a 60" BVM Sabre. You don't need to add wing tip extensions (63") unless you are detailing a specific full scale. If you convert to 2-piece wing, you will need to see plans from the AFS version and call BVM for parts required. Unless you have a small car a one piece wing is fine.
Old 12-05-2013, 10:18 AM
  #6  
robersteam
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: buenos aires, ARGENTINA
Posts: 185
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris Smith
It's considered a 60" BVM Sabre. You don't need to add wing tip extensions (63") unless you are detailing a specific full scale. If you convert to 2-piece wing, you will need to see plans from the AFS version and call BVM for parts required. Unless you have a small car a one piece wing is fine.
sorry what´s AFS??
Old 12-05-2013, 11:11 AM
  #7  
erbroens
 
erbroens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Curitiba, Parana, BRAZIL
Posts: 4,289
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Hi Rober, here are some links you may find useful:

http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/rc-j...fications.html

Ihttp://www.bvmjets.com/pages/f-86sabre.htm

http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/rc-j...to-wanted.html

http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/rc-j...p-bvm-f86.html

http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/rc-j...-posted-3.html
Old 12-05-2013, 12:24 PM
  #8  
robersteam
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: buenos aires, ARGENTINA
Posts: 185
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Muito obrigado amigo
Old 12-05-2013, 12:49 PM
  #9  
ravill
My Feedback: (11)
 
ravill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Granite Bay, Ca
Posts: 5,704
Received 90 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

I've had both the older ducted fan one and the new arf. I thought the P60 was just too underpowered. If I was doing that again, I'd put a P100 in it.
Old 12-05-2013, 02:25 PM
  #10  
robersteam
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: buenos aires, ARGENTINA
Posts: 185
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ravill
I've had both the older ducted fan one and the new arf. I thought the P60 was just too underpowered. If I was doing that again, I'd put a P100 in it.
ok,maybe i can use a kingtech k100,i thought it was overpower but i´ll take your advice!!
Old 12-05-2013, 03:18 PM
  #11  
erbroens
 
erbroens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Curitiba, Parana, BRAZIL
Posts: 4,289
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

De nada , Rober!

Indeed the sabre will be ballistic with a P100... However you can always throttle back and there are much more airframes available for this size of turbine, i think too is a better purchase option.
Old 12-05-2013, 03:25 PM
  #12  
jamesef91
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: cheyenne, WY
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have had two older kit F86. They are fantastic fliers, however I would take a few minutes and call BVM re converting to turbine. I did when I was going to convert the second one of mine to turbine. Bob was very helpful and had a lot of insight on the construction and limitations of that airframe. It can and has been done, but will have to be flown carefully and I can assure you based on my conversation that he will recommend against a P100.
If you can find an AFS kit you will be better off.
Old 12-05-2013, 03:41 PM
  #13  
robersteam
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: buenos aires, ARGENTINA
Posts: 185
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jamesef91
I have had two older kit F86. They are fantastic fliers, however I would take a few minutes and call BVM re converting to turbine. I did when I was going to convert the second one of mine to turbine. Bob was very helpful and had a lot of insight on the construction and limitations of that airframe. It can and has been done, but will have to be flown carefully and I can assure you based on my conversation that he will recommend against a P100.
If you can find an AFS kit you will be better off.
sorry again,whats AFS
Old 12-05-2013, 05:42 PM
  #14  
jamesef91
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: cheyenne, WY
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

AFS are the last generation kits that the arf version is based on. They are built much stronger than the older kits with the one piece wing. If you do decide to go forward with the turbine conversion keep a close eye on the inboard side of the aileron bay. I had difficulty on one I converted to EDF with the wing cracking between the inboard of the servo bay and the trailing edge of the wing. The weight with a turbine will be similar to EDF however the speeds will be higher. I wound up with the ARF version with a super bee and loved it. A dream to fly.
Old 12-06-2013, 06:32 AM
  #15  
Chris Smith
My Feedback: (2)
 
Chris Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Adams TN
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Word of unsolicited advice:

If you want to own only one turbine engine and you don't want it to be a K60 or P60, then make the Sabre an EDF or sell it. Don't ruin a good older kit by powering it with a tuned down K100 or P100. Buy a different and larger model.
Old 12-06-2013, 10:32 AM
  #16  
ravill
My Feedback: (11)
 
ravill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Granite Bay, Ca
Posts: 5,704
Received 90 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Yeah, uncle Bob, does not like over powered airframes.

Really, the new F-86's (the AFS ones) really are so pretty and can be had for such a great price. If you can, do it.

Remember to throttle back a little bit. Its so nice to have power on tap for a quick take off when you need it, or a quick go around, again, when you need it. And unlimited verticals! Ha!

I did not glue in my horizontal stabs in the newer 86 I had, and they did seem a little on the floppy side. I would not trust them to be blasting 200mph passes with it.




Last edited by ravill; 12-06-2013 at 10:35 AM.
Old 12-06-2013, 01:59 PM
  #17  
Dave Wilshere
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,132
Received 745 Likes on 539 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by robersteam
sorry again,whats AFS
Seeing no one actually seemed to anwser Advance Fabrication System was what I understood it to mean. It meant there was a lot less work to do "work out"
A friend had an early AFS with a P-60, flew great
Old 12-06-2013, 02:30 PM
  #18  
Boomerang1
 
Boomerang1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sydney, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 2,967
Received 21 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

ok,maybe i can use a kingtech k100,i thought it was overpower but i´ll take your advice!!
Good luck squeezing everything in to the model!

And all the other issues that go with over powered models like excess residual thrust,
extra fuel to feed it, extra weight, etc.

From what I understand the original Sabre kits were structurally marginal when converted from DF
to turbine power with 14 pound engines (hence all the modifications, warnings in the instructions &
addendums) so a 22 pound engine is just asking for problems IMO.

They fly fine on a P-60, I fly mine from a grass strip. - John.
Old 12-06-2013, 04:07 PM
  #19  
Doug Cronkhite
My Feedback: (34)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,821
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I flew mine with a P-70 and it was PLENTY of power. I think the P-60 is fine for that era kit if you build it light. The AFS was heavy by comparison. I haven't seen the new ARF to compare.
Old 12-06-2013, 04:32 PM
  #20  
robersteam
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: buenos aires, ARGENTINA
Posts: 185
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ok,the fact is i´m buying it because it´s so cheap,$250,including retracts.i can´t get any bvm option because of it´s cost,here in Argentina everything is quite expensive,except beef,
so i´ll have to make any mod myself,i´m taking notes,maybe a k60 ´ll be ...

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.