Community
Search
Notices
Gas Engines Questions or comments about gas engines can be posted here

Saito 300 vs. OS 300

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-2002, 07:37 PM
  #1  
Texas 3D
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (16)
 
Texas 3D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Saito 300 vs. OS 300

I am planning to buy either the Saito 300 twin or the OS 300 twin. Which one is more reliable ? How do they compare in power and performance ? If you choose Saito, which of the two (single or dual carbs w. pump.) would you recommend ? Oh yeah, engine will be probably going on a Byron Christen Eagle.
Thanks
Old 05-15-2002, 01:44 AM
  #2  
n33212
My Feedback: (11)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Saito 300 vs. OS 300

hi i have a new ft300 that i am putting in a 1/3 laser 200 and i do wonder if i need a pump too.
with the single carb it seems to have plenty in manfold vacume but i have just test benched it and hope to fly it soon
Old 05-15-2002, 07:32 AM
  #3  
Cajuncharley
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: South, LA,
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Saito 300

I have been flying a Saito 300 with the single carb for about 2 years now. It is the best kept secret in the hobby. I have found it does not need the pump system but does need on board glow. I use the McDaniel system. One of my favorite engines. For real performance, use 30% heli fuel. A real fuel guzzler, costs about $3.00 per flight, but well worth it.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.