Filling tanks with cowl fitted
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles,
CA
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Filling tanks with cowl fitted
No doubt I'm the last person to realize this but . .
It just occurred to me how to fill a fuel tank when the fuel lines are inaccessible because a cowl is fitted, without having to spend a fortune on one of those filling fixtures.
Most tanks have three nipples, of which most of us only use 2.
The middle one for the fuel feed, and the top one for the muffler pressure connection. Why not use the other one (between the other two) by fitting a tube to it, running it outside the cowling and filling the tank through it, then sealing it with a suitable plug before starting the engine?
As I say, that is probably obvious to everybody else here, but I reckon I've just saved myself a lot of money!
David C.
It just occurred to me how to fill a fuel tank when the fuel lines are inaccessible because a cowl is fitted, without having to spend a fortune on one of those filling fixtures.
Most tanks have three nipples, of which most of us only use 2.
The middle one for the fuel feed, and the top one for the muffler pressure connection. Why not use the other one (between the other two) by fitting a tube to it, running it outside the cowling and filling the tank through it, then sealing it with a suitable plug before starting the engine?
As I say, that is probably obvious to everybody else here, but I reckon I've just saved myself a lot of money!
David C.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: morgantown,
KY
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Filling tanks with cowl fitted
Yeah your right,they are called fuel dots.i use them all the time.Now the third tube you put in the tank should all most touch the bottom of the tank.so you can take out all the unused fuel.
#3
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Virginia Beach,
VA
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Filling tanks with cowl fitted
I put a klunker on the end of my third line to help drain all excess fuel. Also your LHS should have thishttp://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXVW09&P=0
#5
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: hollywood, MD
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Filling tanks with cowl fitted
A clunk isn't needed if, as Dion states, if you just bend a piece of tubing to reach the bottom of the tank. Why have two clunks rassling with each other in there?
#6
Senior Member
Filling tanks with cowl fitted
Only way to get most of the fuel out is to have a clunk, otherwise you will always have a level of fuel in the tank. The amount depending on where in the tank the bent tube is and how high above the the bottom of the tank the end of the tube is,
leaves quite a bit of fuel in a 16 oz tank.
I agree not the best system but it works.
leaves quite a bit of fuel in a 16 oz tank.
I agree not the best system but it works.
#10
Senior Member
Filling tanks with cowl fitted
No it's not. I just have had better luck using a three line system. I had a lot of trouble with leakage and erratic engine runs using the refuel valves.
It's just a matter of choice. Use whatever works for you.
It's just a matter of choice. Use whatever works for you.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 996
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Filling tanks with cowl fitted
I just took off the GP fueler on my SpaceWalker and replaced it with the Sullivan type fueler. The reason was... it took 2 hands to fuel it. One to insert to nozzle, and MAINTAIN hand pressure on the nozzle. The other hand had to keep the plane from moving sideways from the pressure. If I "eased up" the fuel would squirt out. Not only did I install the Sullivan on the fill side....but also one in the muffler pressure line to tank. I can now use insert the simple brass tube/probe into the fill side, (hands free). I insert another tubing line/probe, into the fueler in the vent line, and it runs back to the jug. I can turn my hand crank pump, or use electric etc., and have a "closed system".
The down side is space needed to keep the tubing straight in line with the valve connection for a 1/4 " or so. This is needed so the probe/brass tube, will not be restricted by the tubing being curved right at the valve connection. One could force it in with no problem, but I would be afraid of wearing the tube interior.
My Spacewalker cowl is very roomy inside so I had no problems. I tried it out for the first time last week and it worked great. NO more holding the fill line and no catch can under the muffler. (I could not access the vent line for a return line before)......lownslo..
Bob
The down side is space needed to keep the tubing straight in line with the valve connection for a 1/4 " or so. This is needed so the probe/brass tube, will not be restricted by the tubing being curved right at the valve connection. One could force it in with no problem, but I would be afraid of wearing the tube interior.
My Spacewalker cowl is very roomy inside so I had no problems. I tried it out for the first time last week and it worked great. NO more holding the fill line and no catch can under the muffler. (I could not access the vent line for a return line before)......lownslo..
Bob
#12
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: N.S.W., AUSTRALIA
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Filling tanks with cowl fitted
I use the three line system and to defuel I just invert my plane and suck it out of the muffler pressure line, no clunk required.
Good luck.
LOONY BOY
Good luck.
LOONY BOY
#14
My Feedback: (22)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Filling tanks with cowl fitted
As was mentioned earlier, I bend the third line down toward the bottom of the tank. I , however use about an inch of fuel tubing to reach the tank bottom. Cut it at an angle so that it completely seals with the floor of the tank. Then cut a small "V" in it. It will allow you to defuel completely. In fact, it is much better than a clunk.
This is lighter, has fewer moving parts than a two line system with a valve arrangement ,and it elliminates the possibility of a vacuum leak . My two cents from the old school.
This is lighter, has fewer moving parts than a two line system with a valve arrangement ,and it elliminates the possibility of a vacuum leak . My two cents from the old school.
#15
Senior Member
Filling tanks with cowl fitted
This I understand....and I'm going to give it a try. Thanks, I'm having a problem with my fuel system in my PT-19. I was planning on pulling the tank and redoing it.
Thanks
Thanks
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 996
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Filling tanks with cowl fitted
Hello,.... kingwoodbarney.... I may try your idea. I had the post above about the Sullivan fill valves. I have only been out one time so far this year and they worked real good. I DO LIKE the simplicty of the 3 line system. I had one installed a while back but did it incorrectly. I like your idea about the 1" of fuel line on the end of the 3rd line. My planes are all tail draggers. The tank, of course, is slanted downhill to the rear, when the plane is being defueled. Ideally, the third line should go to a rear corner, opposite the clunk line. Question: I am affraid of the clunk getting stuck on this line. What you, and others, suggest?.. thanks...lownslo
#18
Filling tanks with cowl fitted
On mine, I use two clunks with a fuel dot. To keep the lines from tangling, I put a small plastic cable tie to keep them together. You have to be careful though, you don't want so much pressure that the lines get pinched. This seems to work very well.
#19
Senior Member
My Feedback: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Charlotte,
TN
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Filling tanks with cowl fitted
Originally posted by hookedonrc
On mine, I use two clunks with a fuel dot. To keep the lines from tangling, I put a small plastic cable tie to keep them together. You have to be careful though, you don't want so much pressure that the lines get pinched. This seems to work very well.
On mine, I use two clunks with a fuel dot. To keep the lines from tangling, I put a small plastic cable tie to keep them together. You have to be careful though, you don't want so much pressure that the lines get pinched. This seems to work very well.
the high speed needle to prevent flooding?
or would the pressure line be enough to not build
up pressure?
Thanks
#21
Filling tanks with cowl fitted
Bob Payne,
Your question is one I don't know the answer to. In fact, I suspect you might be right. I have a Ultra Stick 60 with a OS61FX on it and it is turned on its side as required. When I fuel it, I have fuel running out of the muffler. The other that I use is a 4*60 with an OS91 surpass (4cycl) and I do not have the same problem.
Is there someone out there that can shed some light on this? I can change my US60 very quickly if I should not be using a fuel dot on it.
Your question is one I don't know the answer to. In fact, I suspect you might be right. I have a Ultra Stick 60 with a OS61FX on it and it is turned on its side as required. When I fuel it, I have fuel running out of the muffler. The other that I use is a 4*60 with an OS91 surpass (4cycl) and I do not have the same problem.
Is there someone out there that can shed some light on this? I can change my US60 very quickly if I should not be using a fuel dot on it.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Robart fueler
I have a Robart fueler and I like the simplicity. It is really just a manual ball valve. only one moving part. No "O" rings to leak air or spring check valves to fail. And it folds back against the fusalage in a nice streamlined shape.