yak 54
#5
Senior Member
RE: yak 54
If you use a Y-harness it will have to be the reversing type. These have a circuit on one branch that reverses the signal and causes the servos to rotate opposite of each other. If you look at the way the servos mount they will move the elevator halves in opposite directions if the servos rotate the same way. The reversing Y was made for this.
If you have a DX-7 though I'd just plug the second elevator servo into aux-2 and mix them. That way you can reverse them individually as needed. Be sure to use programmable mix 5 or 6 so the elevator trim will work for both servos. With all the other programable mixes the master trim will not affect the slave.
If you have a DX-7 though I'd just plug the second elevator servo into aux-2 and mix them. That way you can reverse them individually as needed. Be sure to use programmable mix 5 or 6 so the elevator trim will work for both servos. With all the other programable mixes the master trim will not affect the slave.
#6
Senior Member
RE: yak 54
ORIGINAL: fozjared
only problem with a y lead is you aren't getting quite as much voltage to each servo as you could if you went through separate channels
only problem with a y lead is you aren't getting quite as much voltage to each servo as you could if you went through separate channels
For most planes and flying though a Y-harness is perfectly fine for things like aileron servos.
#7
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Knoxville,
TN
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: yak 54
I do not agree with the theory about using a Y results in lower servo performance verses each servo on its own wire because no matter how many servos you have on the plane they are feed through a single wire from the battery. The receiver does not have the ability to amplify the current from the battery so all the power must flow from the battery having only a single wire. Now if the receiver had a capacitor or some way of storing or increasing the available power I could see the benefit of using individual wires for each servo.
#8
Senior Member
RE: yak 54
ORIGINAL: Blazer1
I do not agree with the theory about using a Y results in lower servo performance verses each servo on its own wire because no matter how many servos you have on the plane they are feed through a single wire from the battery. The receiver does not have the ability to amplify the current from the battery so all the power must flow from the battery having only a single wire. Now if the receiver had a capacitor or some way of storing or increasing the available power I could see the benefit of using individual wires for each servo.
I do not agree with the theory about using a Y results in lower servo performance verses each servo on its own wire because no matter how many servos you have on the plane they are feed through a single wire from the battery. The receiver does not have the ability to amplify the current from the battery so all the power must flow from the battery having only a single wire. Now if the receiver had a capacitor or some way of storing or increasing the available power I could see the benefit of using individual wires for each servo.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Moore,
OK
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: yak 54
I totally missed the question. I read it as a y-lead for ailerons, when it is elevators. In that case I have no idea, so please dont take my answer in my previous post as accurate.